Skip Navigation

Posts
4
Comments
98
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • It is a Ponzi scheme from a financial sense. In the end, it's just a launch provider. It's not suddenly going to become the next Apple in terms of market value. But it is valued like that, and they were able to raise billions of dollars by lying about its potential business ventures.

  • All of those statements existed to either drum up investment money or get people to buy non-existent products. So those things are examples of securities fraud too.

  • Very cherry-picked voting data. Rural Texas and New York after a huge scandal are very underwhelming examples.

  • The "midas touch" is basically just securities fraud. Something he can't get away with forever.

  • Then it would be another Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, etc.

  • SpaceX, from a financial standpoint, is just an elaborate Ponzi scheme for Musk, who treats all of his companies as his private fiefdom and personal piggy bank. In reality, none of them are genuinely profitable, and depend on government subsidies and capital investments to survive. The goal is to just build a barely viable business and then scam people with bullshit promises. Any real cash flow is immediately converted into cash for his personal use. Though from time to time, he uses that cash prop up another of his ventures. Very likely, all of this will come crashing down at some point, and it will be revealed that his companies are nothing like what they seem.

  • Polling has become a mess, mainly because we can no longer rely on landlines for generating unbiased samples. Most attempts at fixing this issue, such as online polling, have their own massive biases. So it's incredibly difficult to figure out what's real and what's not. And no, doing a hundred bad polls or increasing the sample size won't fix it. Bias in the data can only be fixed by figuring out a way of creating truly fair samples.

  • There’s a lot of tankies on Lemmy/Fediverse. They present a misleading picture of what people really think.

  • The formal news section of the NY Post is not that different than the NY Times. It's just not the focus of the NYP. And the NYT isn't reporting anything beyond the most basic of news events. It's pretty much the same thing as reading the AP. I can't remember the last time they got a real scoop or any inside sources on anything.

  • I haven't read anything from the NYT that would constitute "actual journalism" in what seems like many years now. It's not much different than the NY Post, just with less bombast.

  • A lot of them are either bots or are working for some clickbait farm. You will eventually come to realize that you need to block the worse offenders.

  • You clearly don't yourself, since tanks are made of carbon fiber. Embrittlement is very alloy dependent too. Choose the right alloy and it is a non-issue.

    There are vast quantities of suitable underground caverns. It gives many orders of magnitude more storage capacity than any other idea, including pump hydro (which is significantly more geographically limited).

    It's sad that you claim knowledge, but you can't be bothered to google it. There are many studies out there like this one: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004223028481

  • Except I can totally see them committing securities fraud in order to pump up the numbers. It seems very much like something they would do.

  • Modern tanks leak very little. Large underground cavern stores even at very low cost. You are just out of date on your information.

    It doesn't matter what you think you are advocating for. Your rhetoric is basically just oil & gas propaganda. At best, you can accept that you were fooled by it.

  • Your rhetoric is decades out of date. We can easily store hydrogen in vast quantity at very low cost. If anything, you are spread an old oil & gas talking point. According to them, nothing except fossil fuels is storable.

  • I suspect even more than 30%, and by a lot. Nearly all of the communities that once thrived seem to be dead. It feels very empty.

  • He’s the Donald Trump of the tech world. He sells bullshit to people stupid enough to fall for it.