Except the law did not ban the treatment she needed.
Don't like her or the law.
But in her case. It was very much the fear of the laws rather then the actual law. That slowed her treatment.
Sorta exactly how what she calls fear mungering predicted it would.
But honestly. It's not exactly impossible that a % of the staff refused to treat due to who she is Vs the staff own political opinions. Good for them. But she dose have a point technically.
The minister for armed forces dose not have the authority to make the choice. His responsibility is to manage the forces while the cabinet as a whole advices the PM and or parliament on such choices. Depending on the timelines.
So basically. Asking stupid impossible to answer question Then critical about the lack of answer for clicks. Pretty shitty.
Since the 80s all public pool and games areas have become for profit orgs. Often with very questionable business practices.
This has left low income families in urban areas with very limited options to encourage kids to exercise. On a time per pound basis. Games consoles are much cheaper.
Returning to government funded gyms, pitches and courts etc. Added to an effort in schools to introduce children to a wide variety of sports or exercise based on them finding enjoyment rather than meeting some specific gov goal.
Is an infer structure cost that will pay back in multiple way. Not just saving the NHS.
Nothing against video games. But regular exercise should be cheaper or free.
Yeah. Or at least your willingness to take the risk.
It can be fun making a set amount of money last as long as poss. When your recognise the fact you will lose. Given it means (at least in the 90 when I last did it) free drinks and once a free room. My ex and I had a good night for about $200.
As much as I hate the idea the US is a teacher to anyone. Given it's own crappy history. Not that any successful nation really has a right to that claim.
Warning have been on tobacco most of my life. I'm 53 and remember them as a teen ager.
Also remember no one really paying any attention. Banning advertising had the largest effect. As it was clear warning while companies could still advertise made no sense.
Then banning display in stores. Finally banning children born after a set date.
In no way we're the warning the main cause of the drip in use.
Travelling I assume. Printing very much depends on the fillament etc. not much a printer can do to change that. But a nearly 30% increase in travel speed has a significant effect on the over all time.
Given this was basically accusing a politician of assault. Purely to Prevent him assisting a person in Court.
The amount of Expletive is Still way to fucking low.
Arrested For assaulting a police officer. Then Charges Dropped In a few Hours. Not only was there no case at all. But it is pretty bloody clear that the officers knew this at the time of arrest.
It was purely about not having to face opposition in court.
ICE really is turning into the MAGA equivalent of the SS.
At the very least, CYA. It was well over a decade ago, but.
I vaguely remember comments about the force's post investigation not wanting to be racist in suspecting gangs. Being little more than ignoring the fact the teen girls had no option to consent. While ignoring the threat or fear as the motive when they refused to testify. Just assuming the girls were involved in underage prostitution willingly. This attitude as I remember increased the fear in these victims as the police became a threat that just returned the girls, rather than a potential solution.
While actually ignoring teen girls and parents reporting approaches by some cultures as assumed racism from the harassment victims. Rather than dealing with very complex investigations, they lacked the labour to manage effectively. So basically using the excuse to remove reports from the accounting.
Except the law did not ban the treatment she needed.
Don't like her or the law.
But in her case. It was very much the fear of the laws rather then the actual law. That slowed her treatment.
Sorta exactly how what she calls fear mungering predicted it would.
But honestly. It's not exactly impossible that a % of the staff refused to treat due to who she is Vs the staff own political opinions. Good for them. But she dose have a point technically.