Actually stating so would be the best way to prevent having to do so. That is what bothers me about media asking world leaders this. All they are doing is giving a war criminal a list of safe and unsafe nations to visit. Surely any nation that was seriose about wanting to arrest him. Would remain silent about it.
Actually when you discuse the 187th century. You are talking about pre revisionist science. IE before the definition of the scientific method.
And all the articles you shared were dated 1990s to late 2010s so no you were in no way talking about past views. But instead questioning hypothesis and reviews that has so far failed to form scientific theories on the subject.
Nearly all of these present hypotheses. As of this moment there is no clearly accepted theoretical model on how animals or human consciousness works. Just lots of open to debate hypotheses. Because for all we understand about neurons and processing of the mind. Much of the hypotheses are not truly testable. Just collections of experiments and ideas the scientific community is unable to form clear understanding and agreement on.
If you read this collection and say science believes animals feel no pain you are either misinformed or lieing. These are just a collection of opinions and experiments that fail to form clear conclusions as of yet. Because the simple fact is the mind is still very unknown for both humans and animals.
You sent articles that propose an hypothesis not a tested theory. Hence they are just some scientists proposing as of yet unfounded ideas. They are not valid theories until both tested and reviewed by independent groups.
Hence my who,e point that modern media likes to misrepresent science.
Nope the fact is FPTP is mathematically garrenteed to force a 2 party system. As 3rd parties will always split the vote forcing control to the more unified but smaller opposition.
Ask any vet about that and honestly nope that is not what science thinks. But some scientists do propose other explanations for events that how science works.
Technically you don't feel pain. Your body sends signals to your brain and muscles. Your muscles react to those signals. And your brain interprets them in a way that results in you changing actions. IE your mind creates pain you don't feel it.
The destination seems non existant in the mind of yourself with your hand on a hotplate. But it is a scientifically accurate one. One that must be considered when considering how pain killerssuch as opiates work.
And it is this gap in human vs scientific language that media loves to sell articles on.
Team the medias indicators that science has just discovered it. Is crap. Its more science has just proved or documented something ot has suspected for a long while.
Anyone with a dog knows they have such ideas and thoughts. But recognising it via anecdotal evidence and actually proving it in a way that stands up to challenge are 2 very different things.
Unfortunately modern media really dose not benifit fro pointing that out.
Musk and team (including his possible puppet trump)
Are fully expecting this. 2016 to 2020 was an eye opener for the wealthy who wanted control. They saw an incompetent trump support group not suffer due to slow or non response from the 3 branch system.
So they got competent arseholes to back him and plan to win this civil war before the rest od the US even recognises it as a civil war.
All the US checks and balances are non existant when the curruption uses it to slow down opposition.
Trump places billionaire in charge of cutting spending and signs orders to do so.
Congress points out he is not authorised to do that without their support.
Billionaire starts shutting employees out of PC and announces the departments are broken beyond repair as he forcibly shuts them down.
Err sooner the US relises they are in a civil war the sooner you can stop this. Trump etc seems to be, intentionally trying to shut down the ability for the 3 branches to function against him. He is also moving supporters into military roles.
Its only a defence. If she has no history of diagnosable attacks.
I am no expert on epilepsy . But know young diagnosis is far from exclusive. So it is entirly possible this was her first attack. Or even the first attack she recognised as such. (IE not happening when she was asleep or otherwise unable to identify).
But if she has ever had an event she should suspect makes her unfit to drive. She is required to tell the DVLA and not drive.
But that recognition requirement is hard to define. Drivers are not expected to be medical experts. So in general unless a doc has told her. It would be hard to proove she is aware of any risk.
T1d myself. Diagnosed long before I was able to drive. I now do not drive because my condition is not safe to do so. But was in the situation for almost 30 years. Where I was required to testify my stability to drive every few years. And could be held responsible if I did so falsely.
No. At no point is lackmof evidence proving someone innocent ever acceptable to debate at a trail.
And I the lead up to the trail. It is not something even the defence or prosecution is likely to consider. As neither is able to consider it as argument. Or make decisions on taking the case based on such.
All of it belongs to the indigenous people, it’s all stolen.
Honestly you would be hard pressed to find a single populated nation. That has not changed hands by force at some point in history. So you are correct. But courts world wide have to base laws on some provable set point in time.
Unfortunately that only leaves the states that have removed land historically recorded as belonging to others. Able to face potential consequences for the action.
Otherwise (based on my locality) all of England most of Scotland and whales was stolen by the Normans (modern day parts of france). And we need to start DNA testing all brits before they can sell a house.
A shitty fascist civilisation, is still civilisation. It will end as something close to a fuedal one. Where the billionaires prevent the serfs from doing anything to improve things.
Century is a long time. Those who voted for this crap will not live to suffer.
Many poor nations are suffering today. And will likely collapse into failed states during those voters lifetimes.
So yes there is a difference between rich or poor. As living in the wealthy we get to not make your decendents suffer. These voters forget some are already suffering and are happy to ignore it. As I said wealthy nations will be the last to suffer. And suffer the least.
More then billionaires. But way way less then those the west has stripped of resources and competative ability since the 1800s.
If they were. (As unlikely as that seems)
Actually stating so would be the best way to prevent having to do so. That is what bothers me about media asking world leaders this. All they are doing is giving a war criminal a list of safe and unsafe nations to visit. Surely any nation that was seriose about wanting to arrest him. Would remain silent about it.