Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
9
Comments
956
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Agreed. As I say blender is less fast on amd. Atm

    I don't play games much. 0ad being the main exception.

    But yeah I'd never advise a non blender user to go Nvidia.

  • Yeah. Unfortunately blender is still noticably faster on Nvidia cards. Due to cuda and optic support.

    I only have a 4060 though. Next time I upgrade, give. How bad the 50s release is. I will look again and compare higher end amd stuff. Likely a few years away though.

  • i been linux only for over 30 years now.

    I tend to use Debian stable. At least for the last 15 or so.

    The reason is simple. I use it as my main PC and the stability is my main priority.

    The only negative is software in the repos is often out of date.

    But honestly while that was a pain in the past. Now for the vast majority of things I use. I find flat pack or appimage downloads work perfect ally.

    The only exception is ham radio software. Here I tend to compile later versions if I need/want them.

    Other negatives

    I'm really not hugely into gaming. But use blender a lot. Due to this I use Nvidia cards as they are far better supported by blender.

    Installing the proprietary Nvidia drivers is a bit of a pain on Debian for newbies. But once you know the process its simple enough. Just not obvious for beginners. The community drivers are still very limited thanks to Nvidia s weird ideas.

  • The protest need to be aimed at parliament.

    While laws are prown to interpretation. Interpreting the laws parliament passes is all the power the court has. Parliament is responsible for wording laws that force their planned interpretation.

    To prevent this requires the sovereign parliament, to word the law in a non questionable way.

    The only way this gets fixed. Is to convince parliament to change the GRC law ro clearly state that sutch operations make the recipient legally the sex chosen. And to address the intersex issue by stating such people are the sex they identify with as an adult.

    The actual science only matters if parliament chooses to make it so. Even then the law tends to apply to the science at the time of passing.

  • While i agree.

    This whole article is based on nothing but gueaes and suspicion.

    China has no duty or moral obligation to run british steel infrastructure at a loss. And if the UK wants to keep the plants running (at £700k a day while not being able to sell that ateel. Its rather presumptuous to expect chinese companies to do it when UK ones were nott able to do so profitably.

    Nationalise and accept that is the cost of keepinflg a steel inferstructure when most of the developed world is also so and selling steel cheap.

    Anything else is expecting china to fund our steel at a loss to their own.

    It was a dumb choice to start with. We pay now.

  • Don't give up so easy. Pretty sure it can be expanded to fit you on the bed.

  • Agreed.

    But the issue is with both the words extremists and religious. No extremists thinks they are. Heck I can assure you most think our rejection is extream. And religiose people rarely admit their restrictions are religion. Even when using the Bible to justify shit. They will argue it is science or common sense.

    Their is a need to term unacceptable laws in a way that forces them to openly argue their restrictions do not apply. Or actually are religious extremism. The latter is close to impossible.

    Be honest with ourselves. I agree trans equality laws should exist. But only 20 or 30 years ago society as a majority society considered them extream. Some off us remember it even if we disagreed.

    Gay marriage was def extream when I was in my teens. Gary rights at all in my parents teens. (They also disagreed)

    And a very small % of any of those considered their religious ideals as a significant element.

  • Unfortunately it requires our government to take a strong position. To actually stand up publicly and tell the people of the UK. We will not tollerarate this return to the fascist playback used before ww2.

    Without that librarians and soon store keepers etc will constantly face the threats and attacks of extremists groups. Claiming the same anti DEI and equality shit happening in doge.

    Much like anti abortion protesters try to intimidated those that disagree with them protesting clinics etc.

    That is exactly what is being attempted here. Racism prejudice and fear for the future is being weaponised by the right. If our gov dose not stand up to the actions now. The attempts in the US to override the legal system etc will follow. Reform or a reunigghting of the people who support it will turn into a trump like administration.

    We saw the start of this when Boris tried to shut down parliment illegally. The attacks on the echr are the UK equiv of the claim we saw leading up to trump 1. IE the supreme Court has become political. Gaining the power to take control. Our right is doing the same by trying to eject us from the courts mandate.

  • After 2 180s you are pointing the right way or never were.

    Given at some point trump was not in charge. Seems another angle is needed for them all to be idiotic.

    They are idiotic just not 180s

  • And yet they won’t endorse Buy British.

    The issue with buy British is, it equates to an anti all foreign trade message. Where we actually need a stronger trade link with nations other then the US.

    "Don't buy US" is more effective

  • I can def believe he thinks that is what he is doing.

    But by putting world tarrifs on hold. He is just giving Europe 90days to worry and discuse China. While giving China more reason to consider deals with Europe.

    Add to that China has been building deals with most of the world for over 20 years.

    China has less to lose then the big US corp owners that back trump and depend on China for manufacturing and parts etc.

  • In the US most equipment suppliers have raised loading unloading for contractors.

    So the big pickups are designed to be a similar height to low loader semis in the US.

  • Thanks due to vision loss I've not been able to drive since 2010ish.

    So have not been paying attention to the market.

    Oops.

  • I'd say its the reverse. The fact that disabled have been abused by tories for 14 years. Yet no one paid significant attention to protests. Means they are already invisible to the majority. So the gov knows the can intentionally ignore them while increasing the abuse..

  • So can any nation with its own currency. Its has a cost in the value of the currency though.

  • Thanks.

    Also thanks for pointing out I mixed genes and traits. Was a video I saw so me missing it makes perfect sense.

  • Genuine question. How many genes were different in the original dir wolf?

    Also elsewhere said 20 genes were changed. But I've no reason to consider that source better then yours.

  • Having driven in the US.

    There smaller trucks/lorrys often used for rental etc. Uhual etc.

    We really do not want that shit on our roads.

    And as the same law is what allows many of there huge suvs. Nope def not a good idea.

    Every nation that sells cars. Expects to adjust them to differing standards. Even the US he ce why Vauxhall exists.

    Trump is being his usual cos I say so self with no real merit to his claims.

    At no point should the UK be willing to lower standards to trade. Just as we have to adapt or not sell cars the US wont cert. If the US considers europe ir the UK a worthwhile market. They can continue to adapt.

    They would have some resemblance of a point if we only made rules on their cars. But most cars sold in the UK are imported. Why the hell should the US get discounts our own manufacturers dont.

  • Because they only qremember 3 points about the show.

    Dire wolves where in it,

    And the 2 on Khaleesi.

  • Those exemption do not currently apply to actual licence to vechle type allocation.

    I do not know about the rest of the EU. But in the UK no class of car only applies to disabled users or actual road access law.

    If I live on a no vechle access road. Being disabled would not allow me to drive a car to my doorstep.

    Same goes for any limitation in the site or weight of vehicles.

    My licence (no longer valid as I now have a disability that bans me from driving.) Was an old one that allows me to drive 3,5t trucks. Newer licences do not let younger drivers do so without passing a different test.

    This is the closest we have ever come to adding a new restriction on the type of car you cab drive. No extra specification for disability has ever existed for the changes you propose. Hence why I included this need to reconsider so Ugh things in my suggestion.

    As for the rest of your response. The comment you responded to was trying to address that exact situation,