HottieAutie @ HottieAutie @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts

13

Comments

179

Joined

1 yr. ago

Might want to see a GI. That's not ok.

yes, this is exactly how I end up in romantic relationships

Coscto is like 98% Democrats 🙂

"@samus12345@lemmy.world recycled the worst memes."

• Some dude on the Electroweak Bosonnet in the year 5,798

Roger Stone and Kenneth Copeland?

All 3 major hardware stores (Home Depot, Lowe's, & Ace's) donate more to Republicans. Aside from locally owned small businesses, any idea where else to go?

I am male and have worked in both. Here are some trends I saw, which of course all have their exceptions.

Advantages of mostly male workplaces

• People are less likely to be offended
• Straight forward communication
• People are quicker to feeling comfortable with each other
• People are quick to forgive each other

Disadvantages of mostly male workplaces

• Can be rough
• Can result in hypermasculinity and competitiveness
• More aggressive toward each other
• Less compassionate of weaknesses or setbacks
• Solutions to problems can be intense and aggressive

Advantages of mostly female workplaces

• More understanding of individual differences
• Solutions tend to be less harmful/aggressive
• Individual weaknesses are accepted and accommodated
• Setbacks due to unexpected circumstances are more tolerated

Disadvantages of mostly female workplaces

• Gossip and drama
• People can hold grudges for a long time
• Shady and deceptive interpersonal interactions
• People form cliques
• Indirect communication with double meaning
• Intentional misunderstanding to play power games

I'm in the US. For me, I didn't start using Whatsapp over text messaging because I didn't have a need to add and learn another app. I only started using Whatsapp when I joined social groups that insisted on it for group messaging. I still prefer messaging via Google messages over Whatsapp.

What's so good about it?

wowww, that sounds soooo embarrassing 😦

I dare you

They’re there to stop people well above the age of consent from being sick fucks. As an example, a 40 year old dating a 19 year old is fucked up.

While I agree, I think that current laws wouldn't protect the 19 y/o since any person over 18 y/o can date any other person over 18 y/o. That means that a 40 y/o can date a 19 y/o without any legal repercussions. Is this not the case?

oh, I did not know that. I'm happy that exists then.

because Trump will throw the entire RNC under the bus if they don't give him what he wants.

That's a bit troubling, though I would like to see Vaush expand on that. I could understand that the age of consent could be updated. For example, it's illegal for a 18 y/o to be with a 17 y/o, which is ridiculous to me. What are two 17 y/o kids that are dating supposed to do when the first one to turn 18 happens? We know it's not typically enforced in situations like that, but it shouldn't even be a thing because if the parents are jerks, they could come after the recent 18 y/o who is probably mentally still a kid since transitioning to adulthood doesn't happen from one day to the next. I would like to see a rolling age of consent for that age range. Maybe like a 1.5 year range between partners or something like that until the older one hits 19.5 y/o. From then on, it's a hard line at 18 y/o.

While I'm at it, I would be ok with raising the age of consent to participate in professional porn to 21 y/o.

Edit: Apparently, there are already laws that allow what I have described about with the 17/18 divide. See comments below.

"'Money doesn't buy happiness.' Do you live in America?..because it buys a WaveRunner. You ever see a sad person on a WaveRunner?" -Daniel Tosh

Because what we experience as colors aren't provided by the physical world. The physical world solely provides a light frequency. We sense that frequency, process it, and understand it as colors because evolution has resulted in that being the most advantageous for us. It's better for us to understand what we see as colors than for example a numerical representation of the light frequency. It's quicker to process what we see as a color than a shit ton of numbers.

Imagine a painting where instead of colors, what you see is one shade with the numerical frequencies of all the light reflecting off of it. Colors are made up in our minds. It would be nearly impossible to make sense of that.

Colors are thoughts that exist solely in our visual cortex, an entirely made up human experience. For example, magenta doesnt exist in nature. It's what we make up in our heads when indigo and red are hit our eyes are the same time. Asking if another being sees different colors is like asking if another being thinks differently.

Music is a pattern of wiggling air. Color is just a frequency of wiggling because all light is wiggling, but not a pattern of frequencies. I think it would be more congruent is the statement were "movies are just the wiggling of the electromagnetic field".

Follow me for more pedantic corrections!

Disclaimer: I am not technically a physicist.

now it's a tragedy

Now it's so sad to see, an upper-class city

Havin' this happenin',