Honytawk @ Honytawk @feddit.nl

Posts

0

Comments

272

Joined

2 mo. ago

Or ... you can just hold the cap to a side instead of directly on your nose ...

If your entire concept relies on the graces of the DM, it isn't a good concept.

A DM could let a level 1 wizard cast meteor strike if they wanted, nothing can stop them.

Well, most people require evidence for such bold claims.

Sometimes you have to be that when a completely separate nation invades your sovereign nation illegally.

They are at least not as fishy as putin, damn that man stinks.

Yeah, with their filthy newspapers.

Lose one, gain multiple.

It isn't as big an issue as you make it out to be.

If you put enough up there, sure.

You'd be like one of those PEZ dispensers.

It's because those doctors already have anal beads in their ass.

So they just imagined it, is that what you are saying?

And this info is based upon what exactly?

And you are never ever 100% certain they did it, even with eye witnesses.

So cutting fingers of innocent people is also a nono

Maybe someone should write a new Art of War to explain to tech CEOs the basic ins and outs of technology development.

• Like you can't throw more developers on a project to make it finish faster.
• Cutting budgets isn't just free money, they come with detriments.
• You can't scamp on security. It can take a single zero day to bankrupt a company.
• There are limits to an internet connection. You can't expect everyone to have gigabit internet.

The basic shit every person working in the field understands. Except for the out-of-touch management. Call it the Art of Commerce or something.

They used to think that, but it is actually not that bad.

Like iterations with machine learning, you can train it with optimized output.

That isn't the dumb part about this.

I believe it won't work.

They would have to change so much info that won't make a coherent whole. So many alternative facts that clash with so many other aspects of life. So asking about any of it would cause errors because of the many conflicts.

Sure it might work for a bit, but it would quickly degrade and will be so much slower than other models since it needs to error correct constantly.

An other thing is that their training data will also be very limited, and they would have to check every single other one thoroughly for "false info". Increasing their manual labour.

Sure, and where is your proof that Bill needs one, let alone uses one?

And don't come with a list of actions the majority of people don't care about.

The charity did more than some good though.

Also, name one good historical person that didn't do at least some bad.

It is almost like things aren't black and white but more like Yin and Yang.

It is the perfect analogy, because you are a techy, not a survival hunter.

You buying at a grocery store is out of convenience, the alternative is learning how to hunt like a survival hunter.

Just like how the average user wants the convenience of easy to use software, because they don't want to learn the alternative like you.

If everyone was like you, then easy to use software wouldn't be selling so much.

Sure, but if you look at the top quality softwares, the majority of them are paid.

Because money is a big encouragement to make them as flawless as possible. Something FOSS just doesn't have.

Think of the saved CO₂ compared to writing an entire article!

Vaseline

Heat pumps generally use a lot less power. Don't need to heat up much if it is already slightly hot.