Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
2
Comments
350
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I run a SearXNG instance myself and while it is a fine aggregator, it's important to note what it is and isn't. For instance, Sear does not have a dedicated search index and leans on third party API calls (to indexes such as the aforementioned Google and DDG listings.) This is my understanding, feel free to correct it.

    For my money, I like the anonymity that Sear can afford and that it hides the AI bullshit pouring into the UIs. My son and I were talking over the weekend about how unreliable he is finding the move to AI search.

    Edit: A list of public SearXNG instances for anyone that doesn't want to spin up their own.

  • I use kde connect and/or sunshine myself.

  • People hereabouts know agitprop when they see it and use the voting system to reflect that.

  • Reading this in bed without my glasses and I'll be damned if I switch to cat milk.

  • Assuming I don't want to wade through spoilers, what has been hot over the last year?

  • Giving fresh meaning to the "body politic."

  • Not for a while now, I continued to use it after switching to AMD. It's regularly being updated, give it a try.

  • Came back here to find you know all about those "loser moves."

  • I'm in my 40's and chuckle when I see bullies thrown on their own sword. Review my post history and ridicule me appropriately, no one here gives a fuck.

  • Couldn't happen to a nicer guy!
    Remember Trump trashing his wife and father during the primary a few cycles ago and Ted working the phone bank after being thrashed?

  • From my view, it is perfectly reasonable to be skeptical of any one take, even from someone as well credentialed as Harry.
    To that point, one bugbear I am wary of is the inherent cover that lawyerly types tend to give to the Justice system writ large: namely, that it can self-police and correct for biases or bad actors. No legal source I've followed has yet to grapple with this blind spot specifically.
    Which is to say, I'm right there beside you in being hesitant to overinvest in any one outcome.

    With that, I'll throw one more resource at you, and that is the Serious Trouble podcast. The cadence from this crew is much slower, but they bring a fair bit of levity to the table alongside some deep perspective from the angle of defense, and so I look forward to each episode. My hope is they will dive into a discussion around mandamus also, as I am just as flummoxed as you when it comes to understanding specifics.

    Have a good one, and thanks again for the thoughtful conversation.

  • You're very welcome, glad to share the gospel according to Harry. Also thanks for banging out that killer summary, I should have done that myself but excuse excuse.

  • Exactly, who needs evidence or to actually grapple with the beliefs of others when you can just blithely throw labels about?

  • ...I replied below the name-calling. Clever, right?

    Now you only need to identify the purported false equivalency to match suit.

  • Oh no, please don't hit me with your broad brush of righteousness and name calling... Whatever will I do?