Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)HO
Posts
6
Comments
637
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Yes, the GOP and the Democrats are both liberals.

    But only the Democrats think liberalism means peace.

    Edit: Imagine thinking that there’s an ideological difference between Democrats and the GOP (beyond the Democrats feeling a little more guilty about slavery).

    • Vietnam
    • Afghanistan

    Are you agreeing with me that liberals like to foster foreign wars?

    (The Armenian genocide wasn’t even foreign. It was carried out by European liberals within the borders of their trans-continental empire.)

  • This is you trying to deflect from the atrocities of US and Israel by reasoning that every other country is just as amoral.

    Whatever you need to tell yourself to sleep at night. God bless America. Greatest nation on Earth. USA. USA.

  • How is the opposite true about Kamala?

    Because she isn’t taking measures to de-escalate and avoid wars. Her rhetoric has been nothing but hawkish (on Hamas, Iran, Ukraine, etc.).

    And now, just days after her hawkish speech about supporting Israel, we’re now seeing Israel initiate conflict with Lebanon. Good job, Kamala. And she’s not even president yet.

  • You know, when you accuse every anti-war candidate of being a Russian agent, you’re just making Russia look better than the US.

    Why do the Democrats love war so much? Why can’t Democrats be anti-war?

    Edit: Reminder that Russia supports Palestinian statehood and has called for the partition of Jerusalem along pre-1967 borders. Has a Democrat ever said that?

  • “We saw this through his first term in the presidency when he not only didn’t start any new wars, he took action to de-escalate and prevent wars. The same cannot be said about Kamala Harris. In fact the opposite is true.”

    She’s not wrong.

  • Would the moderators actually do their job for once and call it out

    That's actually not the job of moderators. This idea that moderators should do fact-checking only came about in 2016 because of Trump.

    The network probably should have a team of fact-checkers. But fact checking in real time isn't easy.

  • Trump would be better off making Nikki Haley his VP.

    He could try to win back some of the women voters he lost to Harris. (And the media would love pitting two Indian women against each other.)

    And Haley can hold her own in a debate, which I’m not sure I can say about Vance or Kennedy.

  • You’re resorting to ad hominems

    So did they. They accused me of arguing in bad faith.

    about a person you know nothing about

    No, I know what it means when someone expresses disbelief at the very concept of caring about non-white foreigners.