I get it, but I'm talking about taking specific information from a facility that you can't find online. There are records, but there isn't an AI that can read all the drawings and churn out details.
Perhaps, but I'm talking about are problems within human limits. For example, take information from 5 different sources to synthesize an answer to a question.
The ability to process information. It seems like the reason need AI to summarize different things is because they never learned how to do it themselves.
There are three things occurring with this new facility:
Construction - Generally, the cost of construction is far larger than the tax for the construction project. The county may build the jail in a few years, but the taxes to pay for it usually take over a decade to pay back.
Operation - Once you open the facility, you have to use it. That generally requires some form of operations budget. Facilities cost money to run and intelligent governments try to plan that into building a new facility.
Maintenance - The building isn't going to last forever, and a lot of modern buildings need more effort to maintain them then older buildings. It is common for facilities to need significant maintenance work every 15 years. If you're going to bond to build a facility, why not include maintenance as part of the total cost of life for the facility?
It depends. I'm playing at a table where it isn't any of the players' first game and several players have wargaming experience. I can easily see the DM doing something like this and I wouldn't fault them for doing so.
Most constitutional monarchies got that way due to incremental change generally caused by political crises. Switching from a monarchy to a republic usually done as a response to one of these crises; no crisis usually means the monarch keeps the crown.
You also have an issue of what to replace the monarch with. Most constitutional monarchies have parliamentary systems of government where the legislature has supremacy. However, you still need a supreme executive to run a government when the legislature fails. The process of picking that person is very politically important and had inherent risks to it. For some countries, keeping the monarch as the on/off switch is easier than dealing with the headache of choosing a President.
The premise of the post is that, by saying that I'm leaving, I'm telling them why so that they can change. That has the energy of an old person yelling at the retail staff why they are never going to come back to shop there again.
A lot of people don't respond well to criticism. A lot of people aren't going to change. For some, it may be hard for them to fully understand why I didn't like the interaction. At that point, it is easier just to let it go.
One of the things I've seen with current junior staff is that they have grown up with computer text for everything, which makes reading non-OCR text very difficult and a learned skill for them. Since I work in a field with scanned handwritten documents, this makes their work much slower.
I wonder if the same problem will happen with AI, where future generations will expect a computer to create connections between different documents.
People don't normally purchase toilets to stay on top of technology.
The current state of the art for toilets are that they have a decent metric modeling shit and they have improved a lot in that metric. However, few people buy new toilets.
What are you, American Dream?