Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)HI
Posts
76
Comments
603
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • IMHO one way to reassure people is to improve train service in Schipol, offer direct train trips to/from more European cities.

    Schipol act as a hub, a lot of people fly to Schipol just to take a connection and fly to another city.

    Many connection could be train-flight, rather than flight-flight.

  • Googling for the nearest burger then trying to drive into a military base could be either a genuine accident, or an espionnage operation looking for plausible deniability.

    Either way, these agencies are doing their job by investigating.

  • 911 and similar emergency numbers always cost money.

    In many places individuals pays for it through taxes, but people may not realize it because there's 1 tax and 1 big budget that pays for many different public services.

    In the US I guess the cost is separated from other public services, and paid through ISP via a fee.

  • More balanced than what?

    ChatGPT ingest lots of articles from the web and newspapers, identify patterns in the text, and generate relevant reply based on what it ingested.

    I expect ChatGPT to perpetuate biases found in its training data, and don't see how it'd improve balance.

  • During an interview, a high-tech company insisted on being at the office 4 days/week, said no-thanks to my application when I asked to come on average 2 days/week in the office due to the commute.

    I understand the need to have regular in-person meetings, but insisting on coming 3-4 days/week in the office when then work can be done remotely seems more about control than productivity. It's also extra unpaid hours spent commuting.

  • NVD state they task an analyst to review each CVE and assign a score, then do QC to review the analysis before publication.

    No one's perfect, but since NVD claim to do QC they should fix their mistakes. So now let's see how they answer to Daniel Stenberg's objection. The publication and objections are recent, it's fair to give them a few days to react.

    But if they're giving up on doing proper analysis or QC, and are are just acting as a vulnerability number registry, then they shouldn't publish CVSS values.

    NVD analysts use the reference information provided with the CVE and any publicly available information at the time of analysis to associate Reference Tags, Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) v3.1, CWE, and CPE Applicability statements

    CVSS V3.1 exploitability and impact metrics are assigned based on publicly available information and the guidelines of the specification.

    Analysis results are given a quality assurance check by another more senior analyst prior to being published to the website and data feeds.

    Source: CVEs and the NVD Process

  • Looking at this from another country, the whole thing just make me sad. I hope to never hear of this man except on the day the ruling/sentencing is announced.

    This shitpost seems to make people laugh looking at the upvote. I guess people have different sensor of humor, or see things differently in the US.