Hildegarde @ Hildegarde @lemmy.world

*There is no record of this bio*

---

Read more

Posts

2

Comments

687

Joined

2 yr. ago

Have any of the involved voice actors confirmed the claims made in the article? I've seen multiple articles on this game, and the only quotes are from the game's director.

So far I've only seen one side claim this is ethical. That's not enough.

That's clearly two bears high fiving

What is the timeframe in the contract? The quotes only show a tiny excerpt of the whole contract.

I don't see anything unreasonable about this if the terms expire when the game releases or the review embargo lifts. Reviewers can't review pre-release copies of games until the embargo lifts.

If the non disparagement clause remains in effect after release, that's very bad. Impossible to tell which it is from the tiny excerpt provided.

The country exists because of us support. All of their neighbors hate them. Cutting off all military aid would be crippling, not something that could be ignored.

The us has a ton of leverage without a coup or invasion. Better to start with that.

That is not a reasonable first step.

Biden has paused and threatened to stop weapons shipments, but those only ever included offensive weapons.

They have a defensive anti-rocket system that requires regular shipments from the US. Biden never threatened to cut those supplies off, nor has he threatened to cut off any of the other aid they receive.

Stopping all weapons shipments would change their behavior. Better thing to try instead.

All auto manufacturers put spyware in their cars now. This isn't a china problem, this is an everyone problem. We need anti-spyware laws that apply to everyone.

They could sell the studio without the IPs, bring in some revenue, but it's worth more to kill the studio than let it exist to compete.

When american companies gutted american manufacturing to outsource those jobs to china, they did nothing to stop it. Apparently there was nothing wrong with any of what china does when it benefits american companies.

But now china has their own companies, now the profits from chinese business will stay in china, so they do a trade war.

This trade war with china is entirely driven by corruption and racism.

EA already did this. Many games had real ads on billboards in the world. Need for speed underground 2 was sponsored by cingular wireless. Your ingame pager was product placement and the company's logo was on screen whenever you were doing free roam.

This is very EA with historical precident.

The US subsidizes american car companies too. Pot calling the kettle and all.

This is a good law. Now apply this law to medical providers.

No one is worse at price transparency than medicine.

The article starts by talking about the trial and then randomly switches to talking about apple juice.

What even is journalism these days?

In the US the permanent resident card is green, and its often called the green card. Sometimes americans use the term for equivalent documents in other countries.

Runway excursions are the most common kind of airplane accident. This is the kind of incident that is only international news now because boeing is under scrutiny. Had this happened a few years ago this incident would be easily ignorable, only be reported locally or in aviation related news publications.

The aircraft involved was a 737-300, a model two generations before the max, on a production run that started in 1981, 14 years before the merger with mcdonald douglas. This incident is unlikely to be related to the current issues at boeing.

I'm pretty sure she's from the American Capital Territory. It's often mistaken for the only state with the word state in its name so I understand the confusion.

If the accusations were credible they would be in a court rather than on twitter. Countries are constantly trying to uncover the spies of other countries. If russia or any other country is capturing more spies that itself is not evidence of a breach, it could be caused by many other factors.

It is possible to evaluate the credibility of claims even when those claims are against someone we all hate.

Juries make decisions on the facts of the case when the crime occurs. Declassifying the documents now does not change the facts of the case as the documents were classified when the crime occurred.

Keeping the documents classified is an issue because they are evidence, and juries can't do their job if they are not allowed to see the evidence.

Declassifying documents is a process with a known timeframe. The jury issue isn't.

If the case needs a jury to make decisions of fact, and the jury is not allowed to see the evidence, you have an unsolvable problem.

Declassification is a process that takes a known timeframe. It is something the executive branch can do, and because they know which documents they are releasing, they can prepare for the results.

Juries make their decisions on the facts of the case when the crime occurred. The documents were classified when trump had them. The future status of those documents does not change the facts of the case.

You are also making claims without evidence or anything to back them up.

Correlation ≠ causation.

Without prejudice is a legal term.

If something is denied without prejudice it means it was denied for some sort of procedural reason. As the underlying question of law hasn't been ruled on, you are free to refile after correcting whatever error got it denied.

If something is denied with prejudice, it cannot be refiled as the judge made a judgment on the legal claim and denied it on that basis.