So many phones don't have headphones jacks anymore, and Bluetooth is a bigger hastle than just plugging in a wire. And all the cheap ones use Micro-B instead of C for charging, so now you have to worry about two wires. USB-C/lightning to Aux adapters are unnecessarily uncommon and take the charging port. Same with wired headphones that have a USB-C or lightning jack.
The tech companies have made courtesy inconvenient.
Come on, give him a break. Those are some big numbers! It's not like just anybody could have figured out that 2 trillion was more than the entire 1.7 trillion discretionary budget. It takes a genius to figure out this stuff, a real genius like Elon "I'm a good dad" Musk, who is a stable genius and definitely was not an illegal immigrant at any point.
I doubt before. They're still hoping they can erase or villainize him. I expect the news media will ignore his trial in favor of whatever antics Trump or Musk are up to, and we won't hear much about him until there's a guilty verdict they can parade before the masses in order to dissuade them from copying him. If he does get mentioned, they'll be trying to frame him in as negative a light as possible and downplay his motives. I also expect the big social media will censor discussion under the guise of not promoting violence, or simply shadow ban any mention of him.
I like this idea in theory, but I think it would be easy for bad-faith actors to game the system. Expertise can be faked and reputation can be manipulated. Governments or other powerful/wealthy organizations could easily fund a large effort to shift agreement metrics toward their preferred narrative. We know Russia and China already have whole farms of people on social media trying to skew narratives and perceptions. Hell, I could see a tech-savvy individual distributing a software package to like-minded (or gullible) people in order to effectively automate the process of skewing the agreement metrics.
I have found myself wondering if Israel's actions are causing Hamas to grow faster than they can kill its members. Where's the saying come from, "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter"? Were my family and friends being killed just for existing, with the sole excuse being that there might possibly have been terrorists in the area maybe, I can't say I'd be content to sit idly by to watch others suffer the same. And I suspect I'm not alone in that.
Suddenly realizing the anti-education efforts of the Republican bunch, the Koch's and all their ilk, is actually motivated by self-preservation. It's harder to know how to kill your overlords if you never learn about anatomy to know what parts are fragile. For example, you'd never know that cutting the femoral arteries can be every bit as fatal as the carotids, or that when targeting the heart/lungs a knife blade in a vertical orientation would just get caught in the ribs, or that puncturing both lungs would also be extremely bad.
A gut wound that reaches the abdominal aorta very well could be death, but how many people even know where it is?
In mild cases of autism, perhaps. It can be severe and debilitating, to the point of requiring life-long 24/7 care.
That said, conspiracy nuts buying that vaccines cause autism and failing to see the actual, real-life conspiracy which lead to the idea of vaccines causing autism would be absolutely fucking hilarious if it hadn't been the direct cause of countless dead children. Read up on Andrew Wakefield if you don't know what I'm talking about.
Eh, I'm not sure I would say that. Someone can love/appr ciate and want something even knowing that procuring the thing has ethical problems. Desiring something isn't the same as being okay with the problems that come with acquiring it. It's the being okay with procuring a diamond despite the ethical problems and bullshit that would be a massive red flag to me.
For myself, I'd be having serious second thoughts about a relationship with a person who felt an expensive ring was somehow necessary. But merely wanting it, particularly if out of a sense of tradition or symbolism rather than as some silly signal of wealth, wouldn't perturb me.
While Park said an [sic] seeing an enrollment cliff isn’t occurring just yet, [...]
None of those people are 18 yet. The 2007 kids, from when birth rates last peaked, are just now 17. The declining birth rate hasn't caught up yet.
The article says it's multifactorial, but predominantly cost and the need to work;
The cost of college is the number one barrier to enrolling in higher education for adults not enrolled in such a program, according to a 2024 report from Gallup and the Lumina Foundation. That report also found that for more than three-quarters of the more than 3,000 unenrolled adults polled, cost and the need to work were preventing them from pursuing further education.
Imagine being a teenager. Hungry AF because being a teenager. Cook a ton of food because hungry AF because teenager. Parent pops head in kitchen "Oh, did you cook for sick old me? That's so sweet". Teen: "oh, uhhhh... Yes yes, exactly, that's what I did!"
If he was found to have done nothing wrong, it would have been released immediately and all conservative media would have been parading it out saying "look, it really is a democratic witch hunt against conservatives!"
The mere hesitancy to release it confirms what we've known all along: dude did some bad stuff, probably involving sex with minors.
I could see that. I work at a psych hospital so it's a somewhat different patient population, but I'd bet that easily 10-20% of my patients would never end up here if they just ... had enough money. And most of the rest wouldn't be here as often.
So many phones don't have headphones jacks anymore, and Bluetooth is a bigger hastle than just plugging in a wire. And all the cheap ones use Micro-B instead of C for charging, so now you have to worry about two wires. USB-C/lightning to Aux adapters are unnecessarily uncommon and take the charging port. Same with wired headphones that have a USB-C or lightning jack.
The tech companies have made courtesy inconvenient.