Hawk @ Hawk @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts

2

Comments

526

Joined

2 yr. ago

Pretty much everyone here agrees that it's a shitty concept. Doesn't solve anything and it's a privacy nightmare.

No, you have it the other way around. It means copyright owners can share "corrupted" versions of their works and the AI can still use it. Possible AI leaks won't return the original work, since it was never used.

Of course I think this is only one aspect of why artists wouldn't share their works, but it's not the point the paper is trying to make. They're just giving an aspect of how it could be useful.

Qwant uses their own index, but supplements it with Bing if they don't have enough info (or for images).

It's not what the paper is about at all, seems this is just shit journalism again.

All the paper says about copyright is that this method is more secure because AI can sometimes spit out training examples.

I think you are a bit confused about the E-mail structure.

Everything behind the @ is the domain, on your case "domain.com" Before the @ is just a name that can be used as you, the domain owner, wants.

If you want to redirect all mail to yourname@domain.com, that's very easy to do AND you can still see the original e-mail address these nails were sent to.

So I assume for example Dropbox sent some commercial mail about current offers. Using that, he knew the old account and that it was signed up to Dropbox

This is /s right?

It's from an Apple commercial, which was an allusion to 1984

In itself, this isn't really news. But that together with the other news about him, I think that's pretty obvious.

Why fight this so hard if this isn't "newsworthy" according to you?

Victimless crime. Who says they're not smuggling ammo into the country to use for criminal activity? You only need to fire a single bullet to kill someone.

It's more than correct that they're detained and go to trial. I don't think anyone is actually sentenced yet?

I also assume 12 years is the upper limit for possession here.

Don't most of these photographs use editing to at least touch them up a little? I don't think many published photographs are actually the raw photos.

Helicopter was found in the meanwhile, no survivors

I tried out.

All the options you give are allowed, only what OP shows gives the error. While it seems like a good idea, seems the implementation is terrible and only filters out the most obvious ones.

Kagi is great, but I just can't miss $5 a month for it.

I'm using Qwant now and it's pretty good.

Wild strawberries are amazing. Sad they're so hard to get a substantial amount of.

Not videogames, but the idea that a car should also be a video game console sounds very childish.

Old railway lines in Europe often aren't complete anymore and only cover relatively small distances.

There simply isn't enough infrastructure to handle a full train network and fixing them up would probably require existing infrastructure and buildings to be disowned and destroyed.

The wheel is just there during the testing phase as a backup, seems the final pods don't have it, as it would make the idea useless.

Well, not according to these organisations, like Oxfam here who boast about the ecological and social aspect of second hand products.

Clearly you have no idea what these organisations do or stand for?

I don't think about the price, It's about reselling something you got at a charity.

Plenty of stores sell cheap, used stuff that everyone can fit in their budgets. More and more of these resellers are picking the stores clean, leaving a lot less available for those who "need" it.

Ah yes, libraries. Those mega buildings with every book on Earth inside...