HasturInYellow @ HasturInYellow @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

349

Joined

2 yr. ago

That's still a choice though.

God I hope so. Let me OUT!

And disappointed.

He has never founded or invented anything. Every business he owns, he bought from others. In some cases he forced them to refrain from claiming to be founders at all. He's pathetic scum.

I fully agree with you, I'm just starting my personal belief and the course of action I would likely take if the person was being exceptionally dim.

Almost got him, copper!

I am of the belief that a woman would respond similarly to a couple punches to the teeth. ,Fuck around and find out. I'm not enforcing gender roles out here.

Progressives will continue to lose until they give up their morals and descend into the muck of incompetence and greed like us fine fellows, and take the big money dick that is being offered. You'd be stupid to try any other way of winning.

I am very smart.

Nearing a psychotic amount of rage directed at the elites whose sole desire is to grind the rest of use beneath their feet.

Rip and tear, brothers.

You were claiming that a single country could undo all of this. I really don't know how you take yourself seriously. Look at any data. There hasn't been a pause in acceleration let alone a slowdown.

How long does it take to build a reactor: 15-25 yrs each Main component of construction: Concrete, a major contributor to CO2 emissions How many would we need to produce the energy required to run carbon capture infrastructure: ~1500

For your alternative, it has more merits but the main drawbacks come down to where do you grow it, and how does that effect the environment around it. Growing a shitton of kelp is going to create problems with nutrition in that area. I like this method most but the scalability is still a major problem. The amount you would need to grow is STAGGERING. I don't know how we could do that and still have any coastal sea left open. Maybe massive floating barges in the open ocean.

Are you under the delusion the climate disaster is confined solely to energy production?

Also the laws of thermodynamics say that pulling all of that carbon out the air would be not only inefficient to the extreme and take centuries, it would also use far more energy than we currently produce ON THE PLANET.

I have no idea where you got 50 years from, but that's a joke. we couldn't build the shit you would need to do it in 50 years.

I mean this is a pretty weak ass take and it's not even really right. Like after this "passes" we will be fully locked in to rocketing off the edge of the climate abyss and there is nothing anyone could possibly do to prevent it. They will try with Geo engineering but that's a toss up at best.

No one will remember anyone.

I heard $800,000 with about 80 people per flight. Good and cheap!

Yes that sounds good

Funny that, I do oppose carbon taxes that are not the sole responsibility of the company PRODUCING the emissions.

Trump absolutely matters. This isn't your avg rightward swing of the pendulum. They have gone full mask off and are ripping the copper out of the walls. This country genuinely will not survive this presidency. 0% chance it survives intact as a democracy.

I use it IRL and have used the emoji I think once. So egg on your face, you fucking rube! You've never been more wrong bucko!

It basically boils down to, "if they had had entirely different experiences and had learned different things then they wouldn't be like this! We just need to change everything about them!"

Most of them are lost. I have given up because they simply do not want to be good people. They are not looking to make the MORAL choice. They want to win.

That's it. They would even take us just losing more than they do.

I will ensure they lose FAR more.