HappycamperNZ @ HappycamperNZ @lemmy.world

Posts

5

Comments

1,281

Joined

2 yr. ago

Terrorists are usually defined as non-state actors who use violence to achieve political goals.

As the ruling party of Afghanistan they are no longer a non-state actor, therefore not terrorists.

Yup. And yet some how rockets are still happily coming in both directions. Same two choices remain.

They were right. Until they won.

Israel has two realistic options

• de escalate, don't retaliate and watch them keep going.
• escalate, retaliate, and give Iran the same two choices.

Not OP, nor a builder.

Why not get a professional to take a look? Cost would be nothing compared to the potential risk and peace of mind.

I think you put it quite well, and did so in a respectful way.

The way I put it is to the effect of who's "rights" are more important - the one who identified as a girl, or the entire team who is?

I've been hauled over the coals in here and reddit because I believe we need to take a step back and consider if we allow it, and when we do (because we should) how can we do so in a fair way? We had this issue back with the LGBTQ rights, and before then with racial integration, and women integration, and looking back they were and should have always been clear cut "yes". The issue with this one is that its not just the individual freedom to play, but what advantages would they have above the other players and their freedom to play in a fair competition? Does what I feel and think I am, and the right to do so, overrule what you are?

Devils advocate.

How many peaces, truces, agreements in that area have ever meant something?

F

And she earned it

Great, now I've got to go watch "The Ballard of Buster Scruggs" again

You seen people rolling Coal? Long distance flight, plastic and energy usage? Wide scale industrial farming?

An outdoor cat doesn't even register by comparison.

Looked through history, they aren't a bot.

Did you look, or just assume because you disagree?

Apparently that doesn't matter.

Good on you for looking at facts that support you objectively.

You need some gingernuts.

This isn't a tits pun.

Your mums a rediculous business model

Why not both?

Id argue that 4% is why it needs to be used.

Im not telling you to speak it fluently, but if you asked the general population if they use Maori at least once on a daily basis it would be much higher that 4%.

Or just simply remember its like sign language - if its all people want to or can "speak" and an official language they should be disadvantaged.

Fish are food, not friends

US can only veto security council resolutions. ICC doesn't need UNSC to investigate.

Same result - UN won't take military action, but ICC can still proceed.

Tamgent point here.

Many of these countries also have territory claims in Antarctica. For reasons.

And why soo many YouTube, Netflix and Amazon prime thumbnails have boobs.