Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)HA
Posts
5
Comments
1,281
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Im always up for some older classics

    Been playing some Battlefield 1942... legally... and Battlefield 2 has multiple options for playing actually legally.

    I miss the era where it was fun, rather than min/max games

  • Id argue that would be great for the 80s, but rail would probably suit us better for the north island and much of the south.

    Easier to automate, can include non-costal towns and cities on a more regular basis, and can be electrified much easier. What would be even better is a hybrid system, especially one that could mitigate that pesky cook straight.

  • Yes but its probably the same causal factors - people being placed in command of vessels they don't actually understand how to operate.

    We always were a maritime nation until sailing became closer to flying and programming.

  • It could drive up domestic production, however there us a good reason we import, which is similar to your last point.

    Bad example, but its the same reason you "import" Mexican workers - their skills and work ethic, along with willingness to work long hours for low wages. You aren't going to get hundreds of thousands of Americans to decide to work in a sweat shop, or on farms, or doing handyman work for the same wages.

    I was going to mention the low cost of a life in China, and the lax H&S, ethic and environmental regulations, but America is trending that way too.

  • No, the first page is how it introduces inefficiencies into a supply/demand equilibrium, resulting in a lower quantity supplied and at a higher price.

    No one who every studies economics, even in passing, would even consider another country paying a tarrif for something you buy. The concept is just.... what?