HappycamperNZ @ HappycamperNZ @lemmy.world

Posts

5

Comments

1,281

Joined

2 yr. ago

I wonder if the reason Greek stopped conflict during the Olympics was because everyone kept banning eachother.

Probably called the settlers and shogun expansion.

Wooo!!! We're visible

They leave witnesses.

They just trust the drop bears to hold up their end of the bargain.

Im just happy you provided facts and stopped there

Tony Hawk and Burnout playlists still feature heavily in my music tastes

Don't let your dreams stay only dreams

I wouldn't say either side is 100% "just defending themselves" anymore.

I think the most important part of the article is the fact it was an attack launched from civilian infrastructure on one of the few aid crossings into Gaza. Everything else, including three soldiers killed, needs to be considered part of the larger picture of this conflict.

AC-130 is into some nastier shit

Yes, most organizations lean one way or another.

The issue I've got is that this discussion seems to be saying that it should be celebrated as the be all and end all of this conflict, that you should only be looking at organizations that support your view, and that you shouldn't look into what bias your organizations is pushing without further analysis and understanding.

Effectively, that it's more important your views are confirmed than you are informed and accurate.

Its almost like there's two sides to this conflict or something

I thought the scientific name was birthday hole.

TIL

Whats stopping you?

My wife does then gets moody at me when I walk past and see her. I should tell her to cut the crap.

Can't remember the sun tzu quote - effectly give the enemy a better options than fighting you.

Just making sure I understand this correctly.

What you are saying is its ok for a news organization to push one side of a story, report only stories that support their views, use language that makes it seem more urgent and serious than it actually is, and this is a reputable organization that should be listed to?

And what the other poster is saying is that this is especially acceptable as its the side they agree with?

And this is ok?

Which makes sense when you're filtering through hundreds of CVs....

Oh great, now you've started it...

You could if the title does not match the article.

• Israel may forcibly displace 1.2 million prior to ground invasion. Gives Hamas deadline for cease fire.
• oxfam warns a ground invasion could be catastrophic for those in the city.
• experts believe it may pave the way for eventually ethnic cleansing by Israel.

Make no mistake, a shit load of worrying information here. No where in this article does it say "here is the plan for ethnic cleansing" like stated in the title.

One of my kids said that after a happy birthday message to their cousin.

I laughed and died a little inside

Does it take half your stuff too?