HandBreadedTools @ HandBreadedTools @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

150

Joined

2 yr. ago

Do you have a source for that? This is the first I'm seeing that the claims were fraudulent.

Ah yes, it's not that this is an incredibly unpopular opinion, it must be bots!

Desantis is a goddamn psychopath dude. Trump is obviously not someone that should have any type of power but Desantis is literally no better. His policies are fucking insane, his personal ideology is fucking insane, the voters he encourages and the culture wars he wages are fucking insane. It's not "just a job", it's the opportunity of power, something he seizes as much as possible. He is absolutely a fucking dictator if he gets the chance.

He came to my college campus a couple months ago, he kicked off his q and a with a prayer asking god to kill trans people. I'm not even saying that as a euphemism, the motherfucker literally said "and we ask you to stop the prevalence of transgenders by force if you need to" during that opening prayer.

Fucking insanity.

I highly disagree. The dude has made life for those he dislikes miserable in Florida. It has been so bad that multiple organizations have issued state of emergencies for trans people, from local trans organizations all the way up to the Human Rights Campaign. Trump is fucking horrible, Desantis is not a sliver better.

His policies consist solely of demonizing minorities and instilling facism as much as possible, I encourage you to read more about it.

The 14th amendment doesn't require someone to be convicted

Two?

The only thing that would have prevented Dobbs would have been a constitutional amendment. SCOTUS can overturn anything else.

LMFAO ok bud, nice deflection

What the fuck are you even talking about, have you read it literally at all

It's sexist if you don't look further into the claims, instead just relying on your immediate assumptions about them being false.

If you immediately assume women are lying about experiencing sexism, and you don't look into it further at all, and your reasoning is based solely on them being women as opposed to men, then yeah I'd say that's pretty sexist. I'm not sure how someone could think otherwise.

Other types of sexism include disbelief when a woman explains their experiences and baselessly denying evidence they present to support their claims.

Bernie would have lost in 2020, unfortunately

Lol as if regressives give a shit about precedent

Life sure is scary when you don't understand things

I have. If you think those are perfect replicas then I have a bridge to sell you. Go listen to them again, they're close-ish but there is always something a little off that sticks out when listening to it.

I don't think that's the take they're claiming. I interpreted what they wrote as referring to straight men not understanding why they are attracted to trans women. I think the "hetero end of the sexuality scale" portion was just to clarify the situation doesn't really apply to bi or gay people as much, though I personally think a fair amount of cis gay men are very transphobic.

Nothing you said is false at all, I just don't think the original commenter was trying to have that take. If that was the take, then I 100% agree with you.

I disagree with it "solving" the problem. I've yet to hear an AI voice that actually works/sounds like an actual person. I've heard sentences or two that are somewhat passable at times, but never enough for actual dialogue. Regardless, your entire comment also does not address the issue presented at all, that voice actors did not agree with this deal.

I think you misinterpreted their comment

Yes, I'm referring to the politico article. Where does it say in the politico article that the identities were confirmed?

Where does it say that the identities were confirmed? I've read the entire article like 3 times looking for it and can't seem to find it.