Hacksaw @ Hacksaw @lemmy.ca

Posts

2

Comments

507

Joined

2 yr. ago

THIS!

52% of white women voted for Trump. The Republican dating pool is large and won't be affected by 4Ds.

Leftist women joining 4D just means fewer LEFTIST relationships and fewer leftist families.

I just meant that thrust is only 1/3rd the equation. The rest is the wings that convert thrust into lift at 3 to 1 ratio. And then there is all the systems that keep it controllable and safe etc.... it's a miracle machine really....

Not really. The thrust those engines produce is only about 1/3 the weight of the aircraft. It's in part thanks to the engines for sure though.

Never heard about that until now. Very cool movement.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/straight-edge

I would have said this aged like milk after Trump's landslide-even-the-popular-vote victory, but even milk doesn't sour this fast. This aged like unrefrigerated shellfish.

The patriarchy is hierarchy. Like all hierarchies, it's pyramid shaped. It's not a rectangle with all men on top and all women in the bottom. It's a SMALL group of rich men oppressing everyone else. Sure MOST men are given more "power" than MOST women in the structure. That's the deal the small group of oppressors gave to keep their power. They also give power to strong women who toe the line. But the idea that most men aren't oppressed in the patriarchy is utterly ridiculous. You seriously think every man you see around you is secretly part of a cabal trying to keep you and other women down? You think that they have no problems, no burdensome expectations placed on them by the patriarchy to keep them in place? That they benefit from toxic masculinity instead of suffer by it? I'm sorry but you have a very dark view of 50% of the population if you think they're the oppressor class and you're in the victim class.

We're all victims of the patriarchy unless we're old rich white men. The only thing that separates us is the degree of victimisation.

"woe is men" isn't a comparison to women.

Women are victimized by the patriarchy in many ways. Men are victimized by the patriarchy in many ways.

Everyone suffers from the patriarchy. We need to dismantle the patriarchy both by fighting our own fights AND by supporting eachother.

We don't win by dismissing eachother's pains as invalid or less important.

I mean that's bound to happen. If the main thing that draws you to a space is that you're all being abused by women in one way or another, then it's probably going to end up being a place to hate on women and therefore attract women haters like incels.

Men's lib should be a space where we fight the injustices imposed on men by the dominant hierarchy. Like the fact that we're assumed to be worse at caring for our kids than their mothers and that this assumption disadvantages us in court. Or the fact we're assumed to be abusers and that being a victim somehow makes us be seen as lesser men and automatically deserving of the abuse we get (like in this comic). Or the fact that we're assumed to BE/BE PART OF the dominant hierarchy and therefore can't be victims of it, even though we can lose our "manlyness" through something as simple or human as crying when we're sad.

Only with this mindset can we channel our victimisation into positive action rather than towards hatred of women.

I don't know. If my wife voted for Trump she knows I'd leave her, so I can imagine she wouldn't tell me if she did. Not to mention she'd have to have been lying about her entire personality the whole time we knew eachother XD.

Those doctors are cowards. They can't jail ALL the doctors, it would be a disaster. They need a union or something. I don't know ANYTHING is better than letting kids die!

US government gutted manufacturing? Last I checked companies chasing endless profit did that. Then when the government tried to stop them they used their money and power to elect a government that let them outsource US jobs to China. They've been rolling in money ever since.

This is exactly what Disney is trying to do by throwing an ex employee under the bus.

If people's lives depend on your systems, and your systems can be undermined by a single person and not caught for years, then you're playing with people's lives.

Secondly, even if this was the case, how could they possibly justify trying to get out of being accountable by saying she signed away her rights by using a free month of Disney+?

This is just Disney moving on to their next bullshit excuse to not pay after the first one didn't work.

Nah. Nobody needs mob justice for this. Mob justice isn't justice at all. It's just crowd funded tyranny.

That's a shit take and you know it. The Taliban isn't something that they let win because they weren't motivated enough. The Taliban was better funded and better organized than the government army.

The "voting public" deciding a candidate is above the law isn't democratic.

The courts are not a democratic institution, they're there to apply the laws passed by a democratically elected government in a fair and impartial manner.

Sure the laws should be subject to the will of the people, but the application of the law should not. That's nonsense.

Saying it's dangerous to apply a law everyone agrees with to a politician who committed crimes is absurd.

Thanks for the response, now I KNOW you're just a Trumptard playing "Devils advocate".

This is in comparison to private corporations who have a profit incentive to monetize your data in every disgusting abusive way possible. Companies with a fiduciary duty to exploit every possible potential for profit or they can be sued by shareholders? Companies that aren't publicly auditable so you'll never know who they're sharing your data with? Like the recent trend of cars selling your location data to your insurance company who then uses it to hike your rates?

You're comparing a government who has to be bribed or break a law in order to share your data at all with corporations who have a duty to sell it to the highest bidder. And in this comparison your conclusion is it's the government that you can't trust?

Sorry, I have to say I'm completely baffled by your statements right now.

That's true, but the government is auditable by citizens though. We can legislate them to not keep logs and most importantly we can see if they're sharing data with advertisers.

The half the country that disagrees isn't disagreeing with the laws Trump broke and voting to repeal them. If they were, your argument would have standing. Trump wins, those laws get repealed, no one ever has to be subject to these unjust laws. In a scenario where someone was campaigning to legalize pot nationally but was in court for possession you would be 100% correct.

However, this half the country wants those laws to continue to apply to everyone else, but not to apply to Trump, one of the most corrupt, self serving people ever to hold office. The whole country agrees that those laws should exist (fraud, sexual assault, corruption, election interference, insurrection). Half the country thinks Trump should just be above the law, and you can't have democracy when the law treats people differently.

Your argument sounds logical on the surface, but it's deeply flawed to the point where it's almost suspicious in its dishonestly.

This is the right way to protect privacy. Auditable government departments have your data anyways. They don't provide the data to companies, but they answer questions like "old enough to drink?" With yes no answers.