Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)HA
Posts
0
Comments
280
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • The discovery of horizontal gene transfer implies that it's more like a web than a tree.

    "Biologist Johann Peter Gogarten suggests "the original metaphor of a tree no longer fits the data from recent genome research" therefore "biologists should use the metaphor of a mosaic to describe the different histories combined in individual genomes and use the metaphor of a net to visualize the rich exchange and cooperative effects of HGT among microbes".

    I look forward to this dinosaur = chicken colloquialism being inevitably discarded.

  • Here's an example of a corporation demonstrating positive socio-economic change:

    The Basque Country’s Mondragón Corporation is the globe’s largest industrial co-operative, with workers paying for the right to share in its profits – and its losses.

    I grew up in Silicon Valley and I can testify what you already know: venture capitalists and tech CEOs are just dumb kids with a lot of money. Many of them landed in their positions by chance alone. We are not obliged to give them more credence than anybody else.

  • That's exactly my point. Israel is a US military base, from which it conducts a variety of operations in the region. It is very valuable to US foreign policy.

    Unfortunately the Biden administration has accepted that sponsoring genocide is a fair price to pay in exchange for that advantageous position in the middle east.

  • If by "we" you mean America then I would say that America gets an ally right in the heart of the Arab world, which is frequently opposed to American ideologies. The strategic location is enough to justify the American government's investment in Israel because it facilitates the US foreign policy, for better or for worse.

    I'm not defending their's or Israel's actions. I'd just like to remind everyone that the whole region is tense and complex. It has always been. Oversimplification of the issues leads to even more conflict, in my opinion.

  • I'm aware of the difference in motivation. My point is that people on both sides become radicalized by violence and therefore the cycle repeats with every generation.

    Please remember that innocent Israeli kids were also murdered, albeit in smaller numbers.

  • My son is about the same age as the boy in the thumbnail, being held by his father. They look pretty similar too.

    I can't even imagine the pain and anger that I would feel to see my boy injured, what to speak of being killed, by militant forces. I would be absolutely beside myself with rage. It's really no wonder this conflict has continued for generations. There are thousands of people on both sides who have become absolutely fixated on revenge.

  • There was a time when Muslim empires were powerful. Their so-called "golden age" from about 750 to 1250 ad produced so much of the culture, science and philosophy that we benefit from today.

    Obviously there has been a dangerously conservative shift in recent centuries, and especially during the reform in the 70s.

    I wish that "returning to former glory" meant reviving their intellectual prowess.

  • I was homeless for a year and I must admit that I learned and grew so much. The freedom and detachment is cathartic. It's like a drug, however, in that you're likely to lose yourself if you stay in that environment for too long.

  • Probably because of Hitler. He was very inspired by eugenics and Darwin's recently published seminal work on evolution. In his writings and speeches he frequently referred to Darwinism and human engineering via eugenics. Here's a quote from Hitler's Mein Kampf:

    "In the struggle for daily bread all those who are weak and sickly or less determined succumb, while the struggle of the males for the female grants the right or opportunity to propagate only to the healthiest. And struggle is always a means for improving a species' health and power of resistance and, therefore, a cause of its higher evolution."

    Not just Hitler, the whole of the Nazi party and their public propaganda was based on extreme Darwinism.

    An important official Nazi Party publication, "Nationalsozialistische Monatshefte", edited by Alfred Rosenberg, occasionally featured articles promoting evolution. In a 1935 article Heinz Brücher praised German biologist Ernst Haeckel for paving the way for the Nazi regime. In addition to mentioning Haeckel's advocacy of eugenics and euthanasia, Brücher highlighted Haeckel's role in promoting human evolution. Brücher reminded his readers that Haeckel's view of human evolution led him to reject human equality and socialism. In 1941 Brücher published another article in "Nationalsozialistische Monatshefte" on evolution through natural selection. Several times he stressed that the principles of evolution were just as valid for humans as for other organisms. He closed the essay by explaining the practical application of evolutionary theory:

    "The hereditary health of the German Volk and of the Nordic-Germanic race that unites it must under all circumstances remain intact. Through an appropriate compliance with the laws of nature, through selection and planned racial care it can even be increased. The racial superiority achieved thereby secures for our Volk in the harsh struggle for existence an advantage, which will make us unconquerable."

    In Brücher's view human evolution is an essential ingredient of racial ideology, not a hindrance to it. In 1936 another author named Heberer launched an attack on antievolutionists in Nationalsozialistische Monatshefte. He praised Haeckel and stressed the affinities of Darwinism and human evolution with Nazi ideology.

    The history is really quite fascinating and it's rarely taught in your state-mandated evolutionary biology classes!