Gonna be honest, I'm not reading that slop. You open by telling me that I'm dead wrong, then immediately confirming that my guess as to your political leaning was half correct, which sets a very clear tone that you're here to mudwrestle on the internet rather than engage in a discussion. If you want to try again I'll talk to you, but I'm not interested in trading novels high on insults and low on reading comprehension with you.
against consumerism/capitalism, pro socialism. Pro government control on key infrastructure (water, gas, electricity) and better housing and support services. (...) pro taxing the rich
pro merit success
??? Do you understand what any of those words mean? "Pro merit success" directly contradicts each of the social policies you claim to support.
Pro climate policies
I'm also against fossil fuel bans
You're either lying about one of these or you somehow think we can stop climate change without stopping the most significant cause of climate change?
Does the complete lack of internal consistency in your worldview not bother you at all? You have no defined political leaning, you have a bunch of emotionally driven contradictory political opinions that you clearly have little to no understanding of.
Given that description, I'd guess you probably call yourself a centrist and vote conservative.
There's a huge difference between being progressive to attract women and being progressive and noticing that some women find that attractive. I'm glad you were able to work out/are working on your demons. I don't appreciate being accused of the same based on a comment that only relates to your situation if you make significant assumptions.
Sure, if you're a TERF and believe that validating trans people is violence against women. Giving you the benefit of the doubt that you probably don't recognize that as a TERF talking point, I'd advise you to be more careful about where you source your facts lest you end up accidentally spewing hate. If you are a TERF, I'd advise you that trans rights are human rights and you should stop being a bigot.
At least the program can run in polynomial time. They tried to do the same for yall stamp collectors moms but quickly realized that problem was NP hard!
I used to have repeated ingrown problems with one of my big toes. The eventual solution was the doctor chemically burning my nailbed in that toe and now I don't have a toenail there and it doesn't grow back at all
And hey, you never know. You're a person on the internet I don't know; I wouldn't want to look like a fool in front of you and your deer furry lover if that happens to be your situation
I guess n would be infinite in the limit I'm looking for. I'm looking at this in like a "musing about theoretical complexity" angle rather than actually needing to use or know how to use pi on modern systems.
For the record, I realize how incredibly pedantic I'm being about the difference between the irrational pi and rational approximations of pi that end up being actually useful. That being said, computational complexity has enough math formalism stink on it that pedantry seems encouraged
Gonna be honest, I'm not reading that slop. You open by telling me that I'm dead wrong, then immediately confirming that my guess as to your political leaning was half correct, which sets a very clear tone that you're here to mudwrestle on the internet rather than engage in a discussion. If you want to try again I'll talk to you, but I'm not interested in trading novels high on insults and low on reading comprehension with you.