Guntrigger @ Guntrigger @feddit.ch

Posts

0

Comments

426

Joined

2 yr. ago

The mullet of upper body garments

Was always my favourite place to grab a burglidaner

As an outsider looking in, it feels really odd that this could even be a firm issue for any voter. Like that high horse sailed so long ago, how can you possibly blame the current president for what has been a national policy for 75 years?

Sure, push for a candidate that doesn't support Israel and dissent as much as you can. But every time I read a comment about "Genocide Joe" it screams Russian propaganda farm.

The alternative appears to be that same genocide plus an authoritarian state run by a corrupt egoistist BTW. Voting for a party is and never has been a vote to support literally every policy they stand on.

I going to guess Call Of Duty. They had a Homelander skin as a tie-in and I'm pretty sure it had a laser eyes execution.

I think the point is: this publisher in particular is a piece of shit. Pushed out the original creators and stole the IP effectively.

That's not how GDPR works. You're legally allowed to request your data and request that it is deleted by the entity that is collecting it and in both cases the company is obliged to act on it.

Won't somebody think of the children?

You might like a new game i just saw the trailer for called Kingmaker.

Takes all human knowledge back in time

Starts pillaging villages

Students believe there is a camera inside this hole on the vending machine

Students and their silly beliefs. Don't worry about that lens shining in the hole. It's just a useless hole!

Yawn

Sure, yeah, claim like "yeah it's ethical to eat fish" with no reasoning behind it despite much prompting. You're basically claiming the that either the points I've mentioned are not things that happen, or that they are totally ethical to do. So I'm not going to waste my time.

Thanks again for the thorough explanation of why you believe all of these related ethical issues are not related.

Thanks again, your compliments mean so much to me.

So, you consider it ethical to bycatch, fish species to extinction, destroy marine environments and pollute the ocean freely despite there being ample alternatives to receive the nutrients you can get from fish? Please explain how these are irrelevant. Unless you personally catch each of your fish?

That's not really how ethical problems work. They are supposed to define why we should or shouldn't do something. Even saying "nah dawg, fish tasty" would be more reasoning than you've provided.

Thanks, it's difficult to have a discussion with people when they won't actually engage in a discussion.

So because eating fish has ethical problems it's ethical to eat them?

Very well thought out.