But...isn't the point that you need to know at least both? There should be thousands of people in the venn diagram between doctors and managers enough people to become health secretary: senior doctors, senior healthcare managers. Certainly not this dipshit.
But that's the nonsensical part: Argentina historically only had significant immigration when its economy was booming, they don't have much now, do they?
yeah...elon actually has a massive chip on his shoulder about "liberals" ending Apartheid. And it looks increasingly clear that he has putin-level "the greatest tragedy of the 20th century" revanchism/trauma in his sick mind. No wonder he's a neo-nazi. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afrikaner_Weerstandsbeweging
From bashing and trying to destabilize actual democracies and multilateral bodies of international law, kowtowing to dictators, supporting far-right parties with money, stirring popular support for racism, complaining about white genocide and replacement theory, censoring progressive ideas, opposing unions, it is all in there.
Sorry if I somehow offended your holy cow golden calf, but I actually wanted to know how you change jobs in a communist economy. Fuck me for asking, right? At some point, zealotry gets counterproductive, which is unfortunate, because socialism needs to get more popular, not less with approaches like that.
Fine...I'm going to ask chatgpt, since nobody knows and I'm not a historian of the USSR:
"In the USSR, while higher education was indeed free, the process of leaving a job to pursue higher education was not entirely straightforward. Workers, including those in factories, were required to obtain permission from their factory manager and the state to leave their job and enroll in university.
This permission was not always guaranteed, and the scarcity of qualified workers could make it more difficult to obtain. The factory manager and the state had some control over the mobility of workers, which could limit an individual's ability to leave their job and pursue higher education.
It's not that factory workers had no freedom to go to college, but rather that there were certain bureaucratic hurdles they had to navigate to make that transition. The availability of free education did not necessarily translate to unrestricted job mobility or easy access to higher education for all workers."
I also asked about the 1956 reforms:
"After 1956, the Soviet Union introduced some reforms that aimed to increase social mobility and access to education. The Soviet government implemented policies to encourage workers to pursue higher education, and it became easier for individuals to leave their jobs and enroll in university.
However, it's still important to note that the process of leaving a job to pursue higher education was not entirely without restrictions. While the reforms after 1956 did increase access to education, the state and factory managers still had some level of control over worker mobility.
It wasn't until the late 1980s, with the introduction of perestroika and glasnost under Mikhail Gorbachev, that the Soviet Union began to see more significant reforms that increased individual freedoms, including the ability to change jobs and pursue education with greater ease."
There. If anything there is factually wrong (gpt hallucinates a lot), let me know.
I'm not talking about that. Read what I wrote. Could I leave my job at the factory to go to university? Didn't I need permission from the factory manager and from the state to leave my job? Couldn't either refuse?
