But xenophobia is not class-based, it can be aimed at powerful people (and be partially justified) or aimed at powerless people. Anyone can fall for it, look at the recent example in South Africa: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-66808346
I'm just trying to figure out where to draw a line for an acceptable amount of useful self-defense xenophobia (a sort of protectionism) as a general principle e.g. legislation preventing foreign countries from owning any of your critical infrastructure sounds reasonable vs self-destructive xenophobia e.g. "those damn foreigners"
Man, I too would like to have a community gathering place, but the local church is super elitist and the priest is a conservative dickhead, so while I would have imagined that churches would not be like that, many alienate potential community members :/
Aren't all protests performance? In the sense that they are made for others to see and to bring awareness? What else are they for? It's not for debate or promoting alternatives, it's too messy for that.
As usual, nuance is the important part here, not slogans (you can hide anything inside them). I'll admit that a little healthy nationalism is useful to keep foreign interests from overwhelming you (or more if anyone gets too pushy), but it's important to not let it stop you using all the tools at your disposal for development e.g. CFA Franc is very useful as a way to facilitate trade between neighbouring countries with the drawback that the "central bank" is located in Paris, but during decolonisation there was no clear leader to control the currency, so a foreign influence made sense at the time, maybe today it could be the AU, but I see no credible alternatives. https://theconversation.com/why-abandoning-the-cfa-franc-would-be-a-risky-operation-120551 (the Wikipedia article is notably terse)
I agree that Africans should be in charge of their destiny, not foreign interests...but "Africa for Africans" sounds just as good/bad as "Europe for Europeans".
After clicking some links, I confirmed that there was also a storm called Daniel and that the two dams didn't just burst by themselves, they burst because of the flood from that storm
PS: apparently it's not just the storm, there were previous warnings.
A 2022 report in an academic journal had warned that if a flood equivalent to one in 1959 was repeated, it would be “likely to cause one of the two dams to collapse, making the residents of the valley and the city of Derna vulnerable due to a high risk of flooding”.
In this case in particular, depends whether he broke their terms of service, which is by itself more arbitrary than the law :/ I don't think the guy did, so maybe he can win in court :)
By the way, if you break the rules in your instance, you gettin' banned, so Lemmy is the same. The cool thing about it is that the rules vary from instance to instance and you should know what they are before you federate with them or open an account there.
It's perfectly fine to deplatform selectively anyone who is trying to threaten, intimidate, harass others. You don't automatically get freedom of speech if you don't follow society's rules of coexistence between groups.
It was ok when neonazis had no wide-ranging platform to organise in and were marginalized so they didn't have a way to consolidate into a community that makes them feel supported enough to do anything stupid because they were so fragmented. It was a good way to keep them under control without harsher measures.
The term tankie has been vulgarized, but it has a specific meaning. A tankie is an orthodox communist who puts the "dictatorship of proletariat" above any morality or any other interest, foreign or domestic. That's how a tankie brushes away any genocide, any crime, because no value or entity is too important to stand in the way of their communist utopia, even human rights. In this sense, this group is very close in practice to nazis, you just have to replace "proletariat" with "nation" and for that abstraction anything is allowed: internal repression, invading your neighbours and allies.
But not all "communists"/socialists are like that and many mean well (e.g. Gorbachev, some anarchists like Chomsky or "democratic-communist" Lula, etc), but a good few follow tankies unquestioningly without realising the underlying inhumanity dressed as theory.
Indonesia is already a democracy, it's already giving the US most of what it wants and Indonesia relies on the US to defend its minor interests in the South China sea, but thanks for the heads up, if there is a revolution, I'll know either China, russia or Iran are behind it.
And one of the best parts of online discussions is that they are not biased by how you look, just what you write :)