You wrote "Good"...about killing with drones Mexican "criminals" in Mexico without a trial and without Mexico's permission...you see nothing wrong with that? I don't give a shit about his business friendliness if he's going to start a hybrid war special military operation with Mexico.
Since the spiral of escalation is made of a disconsiderate small escalation (book burning) and a disproportionate large escalation (terrorism), I'd argue most of the onus for a destabilisation lies with terrorists and giving in arbitrarily sets a bad example for any other communities e.g. "hey, the only way any of these people will do what we want is with violence".
I like Finland's solution: throw public book burning together with "hate speech" or threatening people in public laws (since these guys know they're doing this to both threaten and tease Muslims in public) and this way you're not favouring Muslims for having a few unhinged idiots who are willing to go too far beyond every other community's unhinged idiots.
I guess if it happens, this is the point the anti-islam activists were trying to prove and if anybody is injured it will increase the racism against islamic groups, which was what anti-islam activists wanted. Iterate
Sound comment, but unfortunate ambiguous meaning got punished by people who gave you no leeway. In reddit I got a 3-day ban for something like this. Lemmy for the win.
And to think somebody can be such a fucking idiot that they make Trump look almost normal. Is this some sort of trick like in France, where Zemmour's antics were used to make LePen more palatable? Looks like it.
Yea, looks like a pretty bad gutter alley they got there, it's one of those "anything goes freedom of speech" just to cover up for despicable ranty slurring.
Ok, I'm not sure if you're for real, but I have a feeling you're one of the dudes with the writers/actors strike and I have to say that as someone who hates barriers to knowledge I also respect your struggle to keep doing what you love. I just feel like studios are getting too greedy on both ends in an attempt to prop up unsustainable profit margins, thus making it hard to afford services and hard to live on the wages they pay.
/rant
That said, scientific paper publishers are another beast and the worst offenders (e.g. see a paper related to climate change for 48 hours, 40$) many researchers don't get paid to write the paper or even pay to have it published, only to see it paywalled, so nobody will even read it legally, so they can oversharge universities. /rant off
True, I agree, it's not a big deal, just another account, but I can live with it, yes.
PS: but there is still a case to be made for eclectic instances that host a variety of content. Otherwise, if you pile all piracy with porn, weed and whatever legal gray areas it will be easier to pick them off. Same with politics, debatable science, etc. If you concentrate them too much, federation is moot.
One of them is not like the others 😍