Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)GR
Posts
14
Comments
1,518
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • The outputs are still bound to copyright laws. Tracing pixel per pixel over an artwork doesn't make it immune to copyright laws, maliciously over training gen ai to act like a database and outright copy shouldn't either.

    If you have a carbon copy of someone's github, it doesn't matter if you generated it, it's still a copy. Although code is a difficult example since I'm not entirely where the line is for one repo to be different then the other when they are accomplishing the same task.

    I always imagined businesses just grabbed the gpl software and would tell their employees to rewrite it but different. Most things I dive down into seem to stem from one algorithm or two from a paper and the rest is fluff.

  • In such a scenario, it will be worth it. Llm aren't databases that just hold copy pasted information. If we get to a point where it can spit out whole functional githubs replicating complex software, it will be able to do so with most software regardless of being trained on similar data or not.

    All software will be a prompt away including the closed sourced ones. I don't think you can get more open source then that. But that's only if strident laws aren't put in place to ban open source ai models, since Google will put that one prompt behind a paychecks worth of money if they can.

  • If it costs billions and billions, then only a handful of companies can afford to build an AI and they now have a monopoly on a technology that will eventually replace a chunk of the workforce. It would basically be giving our economy to Google.

  • If copyrights are used to add a huge price tag to any AI development, then it did just hamper innovation and technological development.

    And sadly, what most are clamoring for will disproportionately affect open source development.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • The goverment will kill Anna's archive the moment laws stemming from this lawsuits are passed. It guarantees any new open source initiatives don't surface once they are all shut down. The big players will be okay though since they can stomach the fines and pay for the data.

  • There has been talks about forcing Chinese cars to come over disconnected. Every new car is a surveillance machine. The western brands will not be asked to disconnect anything and it will probably be illegal to do so yourself, so Chinese cars might be an actual win in that regard.

  • I think lemmy is a lot less averse to users posting their own content as long as there is a proper summary, it isn't a youtube video and you disclaim it. I would also avoid cross posting.

    Maybe you can message the mods of a few communities ahead of starting to post just to be safe.

    A community is also a good option. Pretty sure you can make it so only you can post on a community so it ends up filling in the same functionality.

  • Biden sent 20 billion last August and then sent an other 8 billion less then two months ago as one of the last things he did in office.

    They are just as bad on gaza.

    It seems backwards to blame voters instead of the party that stomped on their own election.

    The actual icing is the fact that the dems actually had to "learn" that genocide isn't okay. And while they huddle up and think of the best way to lose the next election, we have to actually eat the icing and it taste like shit.

    But yeah, keep blaming anyone but the ones that are actually in charge of the platform and what they run on.

  • I only know of fonttik and iris but neither of those are in the patent pledge. Those were actually open sourced, so Im guessing there isnt much need for it, but everything since has gone through lawyers from what I know.

    I'll admit though, I haven't read through all their patents. I'll be happy to be proved wrong.