Grimy @ Grimy @lemmy.world

Posts

14

Comments

1,518

Joined

2 yr. ago

any true fiscal conservative would want to direct as much of our money as needed into these programs

You simply aren't a fiscal conservative. All your points are directly against fiscal conservatism.

From the wiki, which sums it up nicely:

In American political theory, fiscal conservatism or economic conservatism is a political and economic philosophy regarding fiscal policy and fiscal responsibility with an ideological basis in capitalism, individualism, limited government, and laissez-faire economics. Fiscal conservatives advocate tax cuts, reduced government spending, free markets, deregulation, privatization, free trade, and minimal government debt. Fiscal conservatism follows the same philosophical outlook as classical liberalism. This concept is derived from economic liberalism.

Although that's true, such material can easily be used to groom children which is where I think the real danger lies.

I really wish they had excluded children in the datasets.

You can't really put a stop to it anymore but I don't think it should be something that's normalized and accepted just because there isn't a direct victim anymore. We are also talking about distribution here and not something being done in private at home.

He's going to demand we unhang saddam next.

Put posters signaling you found something (do not mention it's cash) and would like to return it if the person can say what it is on the phone.

If someone hasn't claimed it in 2 weeks, I'd give it to the kid (or well probably her parents).

I'd also ask the kid were exactly they got it. If it was in a tree hollow or something similar, it might have been hidden and meant to pay for a drug deal or something. You never know, I just wouldn't want that person having my contact info.

The Cambridge dictionary has this as it's only definition since it's other use is archaic.

to kill a large number of something, or to reduce something severely

Using the word to mean reducing by 1/10th started to fall out of use in the 1800s.

Yes exactly. Yet the islands were included but Russia wasn't. So the situation isn't that Russia has no trade and tariffs are useless against it, but that Russia was specifically singled out so they wouldn't receive tariffs.

Just take the loss, jfc.

Yes, they were essentially executed. IDF soldiers knowingly shot at an ambulance clearly announcing itself as one and killed it's occupants, and then waited for others ambulances (the convoy) to come help and shot them up to.

We first use the DE-COP membership inference attack (Duarte et al. 2024) to determine whether a particular data sample was part of a target model’s training set. This works by quizzing an LLM with a multiple choice test to see whether it can identify original human-authored O’Reilly book paragraphs from machine-generated paraphrased alternatives that we present it with. If the model frequently correctly identifies the actual (human-generated) booktext (for books published during the model’s training period) then this likely indicates priormodel recognition (training) of that text.

I'm almost certain OpenAI trained on copyrighted content but this proves nothing other then it's ability to distinguish between human and machine written text.

This has been my experience. I still lurk certain communities there but I simply never log in or comment.

Alaska does make sense because of their geographic position but Texas is definitely an outlier.

We concentrated so much on solar energy we completely forgot moon energy, and now, we must pay for that oversight.

!lemmysilver

Edit:

https://lemmy.world/post/27669169

It isn't. I'd even say that simply completing puzzles is far from AGI, even if the puzzles are complex.

I was at a family gathering and my grandfather was in the middle of something. He asked for my help and turns out "Apple support" on the phone was trying to get him to pay some overdue bills with giftcards.

I joked around a bit with the guy and he started to threaten me, ha.

I heard certain guards overlooking certain camps said the same thing.

If someone asks me to commit genocide, it's going to take a bit more then "pushback" to get me to do it.

I'm mostly talking about being able to train on copyrighted content. This is on me though, I got mixed up. That's what I meant in my first comment.

If you think someone can train a model on legally obtained data (Google images, YouTube, internet archive), then that is fair.

Personally, I think using pirated or at least bought content that is ripped (Netflix, DVDs) should be exempt (for everyone obviously, not just OpenAI.) Some data is already behind huge mega corps like record labels, Hollywood, publishing houses, etc. OpenAI can afford the cost but the little guys will be screwed when it comes to SOTA.

It's also worth noting that most current lawsuits are aimed at how the data is used and not how it's sourced if I'm not mistaken. The laws coming from these lawsuits won't be used to bolster anti-piracy laws but copyright laws instead, targeting fair use and transformative clauses imo.

It's sadly already happening in regards to stack.

"Riddle me this: Why are they killing them slowly if they want them dead?"

They aren't good guys, but Israel is literally evil when they murder innocents when there is no justifiable threat. I don't know what indoctrination convinced you that tens of thousands of innocent civilians is a justifiable cost. None of this defendable.

Mostly youtube, reddit and image search. I guess I could just record a Netflix stream if I needed the whole movie. I guess recording a Netflix stream is pirating? Probably easier with a torrent.

What does it matters? I don't think pirating is unethical especially when it's not even redistribution but transformative. Openai has never stopped me from pirating or even asked me to stop. Not sure what you mean with "no one else".

You ever ask yourself if the memes made from movie scenes used pirated media?