Greyfoxsolid @ Greyfoxsolid @lemmy.world

Posts

10

Comments

98

Joined

2 yr. ago

It will never be over. We will either be the ones dominant in this area, or it won't be us. If it's not us, well, the consequences could be dire.

They're actually not making money. They're losing money. Yes yes, I know they're raising billions of dollars, but that goes into the training of the these models which requires manpower and a massive amount of compute and energy. Yeah, they tend to charge to use it (but also offer free tiers) but this is to put back into training.

Here's the thing. The cat is out of the bag. It's coming one way or another, and it will either be by us, or it will be by not us.

I'd rather it be us. Id rather us not be so selfish and rather us be willing to contribute to this ultimate tool for the betterment of all.

Depends on if you consider teaching "cheating." Current AI is just learning material, similar to a human but at much faster rates and with a larger brain. Someone IS going to develop this tech. If you pay attention to the space at all, you'd know how rapidly it is developing and how much the competition in the space is heating up internationally. The East tends to have much more of a feeling of responsibility to the state, so if the state uses "their stuff" to train this extraordinarily powerful technology then they are going to be ok with that because it enhances their state in the world. The West seems to have more of an issue with this, and if you force the West to pay billions or trillions of dollars for everything to teach this system, then it simply either won't get done or will get done at a pace that puts the West at a severe disadvantage.

In my view, knowledge belongs to everyone. But I also don't want people more closely aligned with my ideals to be hobbled in the area of building these ultimate knowledge databases and tools. It could even be a major national security threat to not let these technologies develop in the way they need to.

It's not tech for techs sake, and it's not exploitation.

It's not shitty tech.

I agree with the other user that it sounds like user error. Or perhaps you've not really used them at all, and just have joined the AI hate bandwagon.

I find it odd that Lemmy users are so adverse to tech.

Sorry to say, but he's right. For AI to truly flourish in the West, it needs access to all previously human made information and media.

Interesting that you would say someone like that when the options on a screen are in the same place, too.

I've answered this in the post to another commenter, but I am 100% serious.

I have to look when adjusting physical buttons in my car, same as I have to look when adjusting things on the touch screen in my car. And I don't have to look at my phone keyboard while typing.

I see. So you think Israel wants the hostages to be kept in order to give them a public excuse to continue their campaign?

Thank you for the information. I did not know this.

Thank you for adding all of that information to your original post. I will read through it!

ABC News live on YouTube.

Hard disagree. Touch screens are more intuitive, can be updated to be made better, have the option for more controls, and don't take any more time with your eyes off the road.

I'm referring to this part of your timeline-

"~600 BCE: The first major expulsion of Jews from areas variously known through time as Palestine, Israel, Jerusalem, and many others. ~538 BCE: Jews are allowed to return (until next time). ~538 BCE through 1896 CE: For the sake of brevity, let's just say Jewish people rarely had real control over this land and were consistently persecuted and/or expelled from wherever they were."

Maybe I'm misreading it, but it seems to imply that they were, as a people, born from that land, and systemically were persecuted through the course of around 2400 years.

I guess I meant to ask why is it morally okay for Palestinians to want to do that, but not morally ok for Israelis to want to do that. Is it because Israel is an apartheid, ethnostate?

I actually didn't realize Gaza was a concentration camp.

Why does Hamas get to say they want to eradicate Israel as a state and have Arab-majority control over the region, but Israel doesn't get to say they want to control the entire region? What makes who correct to say that in either case?