I'm not sure why you would buy an open-source company/product, particularly a GPLv3 one, if you didn't understand or agree with the premise. It's probably the stupidest decision he made. I'm not saying I agree with his other decisions, but most of them made some kind of business sense. With this one, he would have saved a lot of time and effort and received the same value if he'd just spun OO.o off ASAP. The linked timeline kind of says it all.
You're talking the CEO of a company who sued Google on the premise that header files, a descriptor file for what commands can be used and what parameters they took, should be copyrighted? The CEO who poisoned the OpenOffice community so thoroughly that the fork, LibreOffice, was founded by the leaders of OpenOffice and became the de facto standard instead of the original, and it happened overnight? That guy?
That is needlessly vague. I not only think protests should occur at some schools, notably universities, I think it should be encouraged. I don't believe an institution occupied primarily by adults who are mostly healthy and mobile should be considered vulnerable. (No mention about whether schools included universities was in the article, but those are the only schools with Pro-Palestine protests that I heard about.) I also question whether certain streets should be precluded from protest routes, as opposed to stationary picketing, due to certain institutions being there, e.g., I'm against protests operating in front of abortion clinics for hours, but I don't think protests about non-abortion issues should be prevented from having a march on a route that includes an abortion clinic or hospital.
I had a cat with similar habits, but it was always empty balloons. She'd even try to catch them out of the air. I'd try to throw it in such a way that she would have to do flips to catch it, and I did get a few full flips. This was mostly a morning game while I was lying in bed. It ended when we moved and she had access to birds instead of objects vaguely like birds. It was also way less fun for me when she would bring the dead birds to our bed.
I have to kind of laugh at the idea of a bunch of right-wing Albertans having to choose between Poilievre and Bernier. Would love to see a split vote make them both lose.
That sounds like typical very formal language everywhere. I have employees calling me sir and it always throws me for a loop. I don't think I've called called someone sir in my entire life. I have used ma'am when trying to get the attention of a woman I don't know, and that's about as formal as I've been.
I went to the States for work (training) in 2000 with only my drivers license for ID. I had no trouble getting into the States, and had to fill out a two-page form to get back into Canada. That hasn't been possible since 9/11. I suspect paperwork will be a much bigger issue now than it was even last year.
If you could mobilize 1000 people to achieve your goals instead of 10000 people, why would you mobilize the 10000? And if the 1000 doesn't work, trying only costs you 10% more than not trying and then having to go with the more expensive option. And coming in before the result that would delegitimize your claim is simply pragmatic.
The same as Hitler, Trump won't need an excuse, but why would he choose the more expensive option? Now we're talking about Trump, so well thought out plans aren't the norm, but he does like to save a buck...
I've said elsewhere there were only 3 real options available to them, and this was one of them. The fact of the matter is, the leader of the Conservative Party is chosen by Conservatives and he gets elected by a riding, and those are two different things. Now, if the people in this new riding think he should be gone, then he most likely will be, both from that riding and the party. And if Conservatives in general think this was the wrong choice for the party, we will see the results of that in the next general election if not sooner.
Now, I'm not saying I disagree with your assessment, and I personally think the Conservatives made the wrong choice (not surprising, I didn't vote for them), but these are the choices we've established in our system. Perhaps this is one that should be changed, perhaps not.
My employer funds my shitposting here on Lemmy, the only difference is they aren't aware of it.
As unpalatable what they do in their free time is, I think you have to draw the line somewhere on what you're okay with supporting. I don't think it's okay, for example, for a delivery driver for a brewing company to be fired for drinking a different brand of beer, but it is okay for him to be fired for assaulting someone while on the company clock. Where this line is drawn is going to vary from person to person. I personally would be happier if they had a clearer separation of their personal and professional activities. I'm not sure if I will donate to them or not at this point. I have donated to my instance, which doesn't appear to pass donations on to the developers, which means I will have to actively make a decision for where I stand on this 😬. It would be easier if their test bed didn't also promote their unpalatable views.
My bad, he was in fact elected in a general election, although there were rumors about him running in a by-election shortly before that, and all of that was before he was even leadervof the Liberals. I honestly, don't remember anything about him in politics prior to leading the Liberals except that half-remembered by-election tidbit.
Another relevant example would be when Preston Manning resigned and Stephen Harper ran in his riding after being newly chosen to lead the Conservatives. There were a number of reasons for that to happen, and a bit of political maneuvering to have them all happen at the same time.
They're wrong, but it happens.