I appreciate the intent but who cares what the people that planted this book want, lets focus on reducing radicalization. I'm not sure how informing folks about what books to look out for is going to increase radicalization. The argument that it might cause copy-cat incidents doesn't really make any sense, it's not like people are getting radicalized by reading CBC articles, they're getting radicalized on social media. And I guarantee the title of this book is freely spreading in those toxic circles.
It would be useful to know the title of the book so I can easily remove it. Excluding the title of the book from this article is not reducing the risk of radicalization.
it is a tool made for specifically one thing. To pierce the skin and rip through the inner organs of a person.
This isn’t true. I live in a country with sensible gun control laws and live on a rural property with 10 acres of forest. We have a small rifle to protect the wildlife against rabies or to put down an injured animal.
Welcome new folks!