☭ 𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗘𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿 ☭ @ GrainEater @lemmygrad.ml

~~unpaid intern~~ admin at Lemmygrad Inc.(TM)

---

Read more

Posts

88

Comments

650

Joined

3 yr. ago

Moderating

---

not ideologically, but I'd say cooperating with the US against the USSR was an astoundingly terrible idea (no matter how revisionist the Khrushchev leadership was) and did help NATO

that's fair enough

yes, they have to prioritize their own safety; my point is that that claiming that they don't care is likely untrue, and it plays into the stereotype of communist leaders as ruthless or uncaring

that quote doesn't state whether it's a permanent solution or a temporary one, only that he believes it would establish some kind of peace (again, no duration specified); how you interpret it depends on your view of the CPC, and I'm inclined to believe that they're highly competent and geopolitically informed

Talking about a temporary two state solution is the same as going back to the pre October 7th status quo

no, it would return part of the occupied territories to the Palestinians, leaving them in a better position for the inevitable conflict to dismantle "Israel"

not directly intervening or completely denouncing "Israel" doesn't imply that they don't care about Palestine

Why are you assuming that the CPC leadership doesn't care about Palestine? If they were to suddenly demand the dismantling of "Israel", the risk of a third world war would likely increase significantly

there's a big difference between a permanent two-state solution (practically impossible in the long run, and unreasonable to the Palestinians) and a temporary two-state solution to stop the current genocide and let the Palestinians recover (what Hamas and others want)

I don't know if it's the "official" one (if such a thing exists), but here's one

it isn't; regardless of its rhetoric, Amerika wants a one-state "solution" without Palestinians, whereas China wants some kind of peace

it reminds me of a certain month of the year that's usually cool in temperate climates

I think you were just overwhelmed by the number of upvotes

Oppo deleted this message a few seconds ago but I managed to take a screenshot

Everything you mentioned here involves contributing to collective action. If your point is that you don't necessarily need to be part of a communist organization to contribute to future revolution, I agree, but aside from radicalizing people you know (which is important), you can't do much on your own

I love [...] the socialism

Their political structure is atrocious

yes, it's extremely unlikely to happen before imperialism has been eradicated

yes

This, more or less. Class oppression will disappear, which eliminates the state by definition. Some kind of governance/administration will still exist, and central planning will likely still exist, but all operations of the "government" (whatever form it takes) will be transparent and everyone involved will be subject to constant public scrutiny and the risk of replacement if they're ineffective. Some kind of law enforcement will also likely still exist, with similar transparency and democratic control