GoodEye8 @ GoodEye8 @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

1,165

Joined

2 yr. ago

It takes time to alter the course of the market. Intel has been shitting the bed with their CPU-s for over a decade and in that time frame the market has gone from something like 95% Intel, 5% AMD to ~60% Intel, 40% AMD. The average consumer doesn't really care about Intel vs AMD either, but somehow the market has shifted. We just have to hope Nvidia shits the bed for the next decade.

This is why my online gaming has kinda died off. I don't really mind matchmaking and I think skill-based matchmaking definitely has a place in actually competitive games, but I miss the communities that get built up around a dedicated server. My fondest memories of multiplayer games come from community servers, because eventually you just know who you're playing with and it becomes a place to hang out.

But the story beat is static, it always gives you the same enemy in the same situation. The nemesis system turns that story beat dynamic. Every time you hit that story beat you get a different enemy in a different situation. It doesn't give everyone the same story, it gives everyone their story. It's innovation is how the system sets up stories and ties them into the gameplay. The system is designed to draw you into an encounter with a nemesis, there are multiple outcomes to that encounter. Those encounters become callbacks in the next encounter and so on and on until you've create a storyarc against that enemy.

For example I remember having a nemesis I couldn't kill with a sneak attack (which was very much my preferred way of getting rid of nemesis I wanted to get rid of). So I had to fight him head on and I set him on fire. He managed to escape while I was being overrun by grunts. One of the grunts slayed me and became a new nemesis. Meanwhile the one that got away gained a new weaknesses to fire. One storyline branched into two storylines. Not only did my individual story born from the nemesis system branch out, the gameplay encounters with those nemesis also changed from the previous encounter. The next time I fought my old nemesis I had a new trick up my sleeve, I could use fire against them. As for the new nemesis, well get to him.

That's the innovation of the nemesis system. It's a story generator that gives you your story and each encounter alters the gameplay for the next encounter. But that's only the foundation of the nemesis system. The Nemesis hierarchy and relations between them is an extra layer of storytelling. For example that grunt who killed me turned out to become a really annoying nemesis, I really struggled killing him and every encounter only made him stronger. So I devised a different strategy. I ended up turning other orks that surrounded him in the hierarchy and started using them to do my dirty work. In the end I wasn't the one to slay my new nemesis, it was a different ork (under my control) who challenged him and killed him.

And final note on what really makes all of it work is the presentation. The orks aren't just a randomized collection of traits, they're voiced and somewhat visually unique and whatever randomized outcome they get to at the end of the encounter gets properly presented in the next encounter. The presentation is the glue that ties all those encounters together into one story. You're presented with an actual nemesis and not just some generic mute and they "remember" the things you did to them before. They feel like a nemesis and not just some randomly generated grunt.

If you tried it and didn't see the appeal I'm guessing the game was too easy. I wasn't impressed by the nemesis system until the orks had a chance to escape or I was forced to retreat or I got killed. The system really opens up and gets interesting when the game gets so challenging that you're no longer certain what will happen in any encounter.

Entitlement and cognitive dissonance and strong forces these days. I’m sorry you can’t see past them.

The irony...

Duh, kinda hard to argue anything when all you get is word vomit. but hey, I'll give my best effort then.

Man, if only you put this much effort into advocating for a modest lifestyle.

Erm, what? Have you read nothing I've said? I said getting rid of consumerism would be a net benefit to society, but I'm not going to advocate the stupidity that you're peddling.

It just goes to show: you don’t want to solve these problems because you benefit from them.

Clearly you didn't bother to actually explain how I benefit so I actually have no fucking clue what you're trying to say here. Considering I was pretty explicit in wanting others to be paid a fair wage so they'd have a better life I will happily be selfish in wanting a better life for others. I'll that selfishness over whatever you are.

And that was were your post ended but because you're foaming from the mouth you can't gather your before you post so you added an edit. And just for the sake of clarity, I posted my previous comment before the edit you added. Not that it matters because it's not like your edits are making any more sense.

You’re also just straight up lying at this point. It’s crazy how much effort you are putting into this, but it’s to be expected because of your cognitive dissonance.

So your counter-argument here is that I'm just straight up lying and then you proceed to insult. However once again you don't bother explaining anything so there's nothing to argue.

And then of course you couldn't stop there, you had to edit once again because thinking before speaking is not a skill you have.

I’m not going to sift through or quote your bullshit, but we both know that it’s there. Keep trying to justify your entitlement, bud. I will always see it for what it is.

Oh please do (I know you won't because that would take actual effort), because I think you haven't bothered to check who you're arguing with and you think I'm someone else. That's how little attention you paying to this discussion.

Now kindly accept my concession with something I said previously:

But hey, don’t let me stop you from letting everyone know what you are.

I guess it's time for your meds because you're starting to speak complete nonsense.

It's amazing how confidently wrong you can be.

You’re not a minimum wage worker, bub. This is what I mean by why should you get more before others who have less?

I am not a minimum wage worker and I never said I was. I'm relatively well off and I think everyone should be able to have a life similar to mine, in terms of fulfillment. I don't demand more for myself, I demand more for everyone else because I don't think anyone deserves to be poor and needing to deal with the stress of having no money.

Why should we improve your lifestyle in the big city

I don't live in a big city. I live in a small town because I have the luxury of working remotely.

you’re “too good” to accept a more modest

I live a pretty modest life, some might even call it frugal. I don't own a car because it's a huge money sink. I cook my own meals because eating out is expensive. I don't buy cheap clothes but I do buy clothes that last a long time because if they last longer I end up spending less money on clothes. I don't really spend much money outside of necessities and the occasional entertainment.

affordable lifestyle outside of one

I have a budget and I stick to it. I have no problem having an affordable lifestyle.

You’re not willing to invest in making more places livable and improving the lives of others

I contribute to my local community. I would be more specific but I honestly have no fucking idea what you're even trying to imply here.

you’re just looking for ways to justify your entitlement to have as much as you can get.

Wrong once again.

It’s not a big surprise. I don’t expect more from people like you at this point. I would be foolish if I did.

I absolutely agree because I'm not at all surprised how you can be so confidently wrong.

And you're proving my point about this being a waste of time. But that's fine. It's fine if you get so riled up that you need to call me a liar and insecure and claiming I want to derail whatever soapbox you're on. I don't care because at the end of the day I'm not the one telling minimum wage workers, who can't afford to save money, that all they need to do is just save more money. Unlike you I know what being poor means, which is why I know what you're saying is compete garbage. But hey, don't let me stop you from letting everyone know what you are.

And I'm going to say more people wanted official ultrawide support. Now what? Are we supposed to poll every time someone wants to do something? If I feel like important for me to jaywalk and I step in front of a car and the driver feels it's more important for them to not stop what then? Are we supposed to block traffic to until we figure out whose action is more important so they'd have right of way?

This is why we have laws, because everything does not need to be looked at case by case and sometimes we can collectively agree that one way is always better than the other way.

Right. So whoever did the update at Bethesda found it important to do that update. The developers of FO:London found it important to release their mod. If you ask the Bethesda employee they'd think their work was more important. If you ask the FO:L team they would say their work was more important. How do you determine whose importance was more important?

It's not an all or nothing thing, getting rid of consumerism would definitely be a net positive for society. But your suggestion goes squarely in the same hole as "to solve climate change people need to watch their carbon footprint" while completely ignoring the fact that the biggest polluters are corporations. Or the "to solve microplastics people need to sort their trash" which again completely ignores the fact that a very small part of plastics are recyclable because most corporations won't spend extra money to make more recyclable plastics (or ideally not use plastics at all).

What you're suggesting is a net positive in the context of the problem but its not going to solve the problem. Just like with climate change and microplastics your "solution" is just kicking the can down the road instead of actually solving the problem.

I ended up reading your other comments. You're out of touch with reality and there's nothing I could say that others haven't already brought up, and since you're not listening to them I doubt you'll listen to me. So the only thing I can add is that you should start practicing what you're preaching and get off the internet because the internet is a luxury. Then again I imagine you won't have a problem justifying your own "wasting money on bullshit" because you can afford it.

Wealthiest nation in the world (by a large margin if I may add), regular people are struggling to get by and your solution is "just be more frugal"? I'd imagine if you're the wealthiest nation in the world you can afford some luxuries but I guess not according to you. Also, if you're so wealthy where does all that wealth go?

That's exactly my point. It was his job to know and he barely knew anything. If there was someone trying to verify the existence of magic Ron's dad wouldn't be able to do anything about it because he wouldn't even understand what that person is doing.

I think you can play PvE Tarkov because the raids run on your machine (except for Streets). But if you're already willing play PvE you might as well play SPtarkov which does work on Linux and has a modding scene that offers a significantly better PvE experience.

EDIT: just a PSA that Tarkov uses Battleye, which supports Proton. Just like with almost every other game the only reason you can't play Tarkov on Linux is because the developer doesn't want to you to do that.

I'm fine with that. I'm not saying we should be able to "aquire" magic. I'm saying we're somehow incapable of even acknowledging its existence. If muggles can't perceive magic then what's the point of keeping it a secret.

Obviously that's not true because not only could Dursleys see magic but it was used on them, thus magic is observable and muggles would be trying to harness it because they wouldn't know they can't.

So it also somewhat makes sense why they'd have a secret society. But to keep it a secret you need know what the muggles are up to so they wouldn't discover your secret. You need something like an intelligence agency to keep track of muggles and intervene if they get close to the secret.

But you don't know how the muggle world works, so you don't know what the muggles are doing which means you can't intervene if they start to discover magic. If you can't prevent them from discovering magic why haven't they discovered magic?

While I think that can be explained away with the idea that the magic is so OP they don't actually need to know science. To use the Rowlings own tidbit as an example, why bother with toilets when you can simply magic away your shit.

And that also leads to what IMO is the biggest plot point nobody really thinks about. That there's a secret society of magic users who almost exclusively use magic, and the "muggle" society has no idea of its existence.

Think about all the things we've discovered. Electromagnetism is pretty much magic, we figured that out. Atoms are pretty much magic, not only did we figure out atoms we figured out what atoms consist of. Einstein predicted black holes, something so out there that even Einstein doubted his prediction, we later discovered and modeled it. We can literally come up with absolutely insane ideas and then come up with ways to prove or disprove those ideas. There's no chance we wouldn't figure out the existence of magic and a secret society if we saw glimpses of something that makes us go "hmm, that's interesting".

You could argue that they use magic to hide magic from us, but they'd have to know about what we are doing to make sure we don't accidentally stumble into discovering magic. But Arthur Weasley makes it pretty clear wizards don't understand how our world works. They don't know what we're doing so their secret society is literally at the mercy of us not just noticing it.

So the secret of society pretty much exists on the premise that we're too stupid to figure out Magic, but smart enough to create the society we have.

You never know when old games just don't work. For example I recently tried to play deus ex mankind divided. I have new hardware but I had to play on medium settings because anything higher would start killing performance despite the game being 5 years older than my hardware.

I wouldn't be surprised if some older games ran like shit on the 50 series cards whenever physx is concerned.

Javascript is fun. The video takes a few jabs at ruby and then gives a glimpse into the insanity that is Javascript.

I'm going to be a bit controversial but I think Harris getting elected wouldn't have solved people not being able to afford to rent let alone buy a house, it would've have solved the cost of living, the abhorrent state of health care, the laughably poor labor rights etc. Harris would've had a better impact on an international stage (for example not turning former allies against the US) but for America it would've a road down the significantly less steeper hill than what Trump brought, however downhill nonetheless. Americans are getting screwed regardless of who they vote for because the politicians work for the corporations not the American people.