Vim > VSCode
GoodEye8 @ GoodEye8 @lemm.ee Posts 0Comments 1,165Joined 2 yr. ago
GoodEye8 @ GoodEye8 @lemm.ee
Posts
0
Comments
1,165
Joined
2 yr. ago
I said continuous vertical lines and literally posted a screenshot of it not being able to do it.
But it's literally doing that in your image. When a horizontal and vertical line cross the horizontal line breaks.
No, it’s not. The human brain does not process dashed lines as easily as it does continuous lines. A whole bunch of dashed lines are objectively harder to follow than continuous ones.
Oh, did you mean the points that represent actual commits? You're arguing it's trash because there's no line between two adjacent commits? Really?
You can think that’s not important, but the literal decades of UX research and attention to fine grained user interaction, can prove that you’re just flat out wrong.
You've brought it up multiple times now so I think it's time you also source that claim. Cmon, source the claim where the code editor with better visual fidelity increases productivity.
Literally just go ahead and try and visualize a basuc cube with this base point and dimensions through a CLI and watch that wow, maybe a fucking typewriter interface isn’t the best for absolutely everything:
Not only is this a stupid argument but it's one that I've already addressed. Yes, terminal can't do everything, but I don't think anyone is using VS code to look at a cube either. Actually, I'm not even sure if there is a VS code extension that draws cubes? So you wouldn't use VS code for that either. Just like someone using terminal for development would use a different tool to visualize a cube you'd do the same thing if you were using VS code for development. What the fuck are you even arguing here?
I think you meant horizontal line because lazygit is drawing vertical lines. And if we were to get pedantic when to lines cross in vs code then one of them also breaks which means vs code also doesn't have continuous lines. It's functionally the same visual representation of data so you're literally arguing over it not looking like you want it to look.
You're literally refusing to acknowledge the graphical difference between the standard git tree and Lazygit git tree, and you call it trash because it doesn't look like you want it to look. It's dogmatic.
Just as dogmatic as the people you complain about.
Getting an automatic terminal window when you start up vs code is no different having two panes in tmux, one for VIM and once for terminal. You can get a visual project tree representation in VIM by using neotree plugin. Your git doesn't need to look like that, you can use lazygit. The only things you can't do within a terminal are reading the pdf or checking assets etc (but I personally wouldn't look at those things within vs code either), everything else you can do just as easily within the terminal without it looking like the image you gave.
I gave you the benefit of doubt by stating you don't know how to set up a terminal environment. But if you're going to be adamant about knowing what you're talking about then you should also know you're deliberately misrepresenting the alternative to make your arguments seem more valid.
While I agree with your general idea that there shouldn't be any dogmatic insistence that terminal environments are superior and everyone should use them. But the points you're bringing up tell me that you don't actually know how to use a terminal environment for development which makes your point equally as dogmatic as the terminal purists.
Yeah, I would always pick the law over the union. I once had an employer try to fuck me over the pettiest thing. they had incorrectly, probably deliberately, terminated my contract so that I was ineligible for unemployment benefits. They don't pay that benefit and it takes them literally 5 minutes to fix it, so it pretty much would cost them nothing to make that change. But it meant the world for me because that would've been the only way for me to put food on the table. I argued with them for days and the entire time they're gaslighting me with "You don't know what you're talking about, we did everything right. Nothing is wrong." Eventually I got fed up. I told them "I don't need to deal with this shit. Give me the official reason why you can't change the reason for me termination. I'll forward it to the labour office and you can deal with them." literally the next thing they said was "fine, we'll fix it." and 5 minutes later it was done.
I imagine a union would've also helped me in that scenario, but I enjoyed the safety of knowing I could stick the law in their face and tell them to eat shit. My opinion is that worker unions are great but labor laws are even better.
Yeah. You don't need to look far (to lemmy.ml) to find people who argue that Russia is perfectly justified in not respecting the ceasefire. Clearly we won't be changing the mind of those people because to them anything Ukraine related (from the west) is 100% propaganda which means Macron stating the obvious is also just "propaganda" to them. But for people who aren't keeping up with the news it's useful to remind them that the world doesn't believe the tankie sauce certain people seem to think is the truth.
Was that even a thing? I mean it makes no sense. Why would Cadillac care when they have a deal to keep using Ferrari engines until they can get their own engine ready (which last I checked they're aiming for 2028)? The V10 switch has no impact on Cadillac.
Because it's largely irrelevant? If someone says "This is the best lock you can use on your front door" and someone else replies "not if you leave the key in the lock" do you think that's a important thing to mention? No lock is safe if you leave the key in the lock. Maybe it's important to remind people that you shouldn't leave your key in the lock, but that statement says nothing about the security of the lock.
Similarly maybe it's important to remind people that their phones might already be rooted, but that statement says nothing about whether Signal is good or bad from a security point of view.
takes a hit of copium
Ferrari is just getting their yearly qouta of absolutely horrible decisions and stupid mistakes done at the start of the season so the rest of the season could be smooth sailing.
Their losses are clearly significant enough to bring a foreign army (North Koreans) to replenish their forces. Maybe not 50% but I don't think it's that far off.
Yeah, Embark was founded by the former CEO of DICE so I imagine quite a lot of DICE talent moved to Embark.
I think I was rambling a bit. I think the best course of action is to just give it a try because I think the gameplay is the biggest make or break for people. If you don't enjoy the gameplay then it doesn't matter if the game isn't a toxic mess and not really predatory with the MTX.
RBR should suck it up and put Tsunoda in the seat. Tsunoda is clearly fast and he said the RB20 "suits my driving style" which means RB21 should also be up his alley.
I think RB has accidentally designed their to be impossible to drive because Max isn't happy with the car either. The only reason he gets anything done with the car is because he's Max Verstappen.
I would say the community is much better than what you would expect from Call of Duty or Destiny or anything looking to hit super mainstream. I think most toxic players won't play the game because the game has a high effective TTK. The average encounter is around probably 1-2 seconds because you usually need to hit more than 5 shots and your opponent has enough time to react and use movement to make them a harder target to hit. The higher TTK may be a deal breaker, it was for a lot of people during launch, but I personally enjoy it.
I think the MTX is pretty mild. It's all cosmetic so they don't impact the core gameplay at all, which means if you don't care about cosmetics your only interaction with the MTX is the little sale window on the top left of the main menu. You can earn some in game currency to buy cosmetics but because it's F2P their only revenue streams are the battlepass (which again is also strictly cosmetic rewards or in game currency) and the cosmetic shop. Some things are only for real cash and they can look expensive (like $20 for a pack of cosmetic items) but they usually come with in game currencies so if you're planning to use the in game currency as well that $20 usually drops to $7-$8 which for 2025 isn't actually that much. I forgot to mention, the battlepass can be bought for the in game currency so what I've done is bought the $20 thingy and the use most of the in game currency to buy the battlepass.
Just a PSA, The Finals is playable on Linux and is F2P with a very reasonable monetization (cosmetic only with some free cosmetic options as well) and the new season just began.
For me it scratches that multiplayer itch because the destructible environments make matches feel very dynamic.
Rally drivers need to be able to express themselves, otherwise we wouldn't get gems like this.
My bad. I literally didn't notice that single pixel between the two lines.
So it's trash because it doesn't look like how you want it to look like. Got it.
Sure. I'd say you would understand me not taking the word of someone who has no problem being confidently wrong, but somehow I doubt you'd understand.
Sorry. I made an invalid assumption because I've never had an actual need for anything like that. But hey, I never said VIM needs to do everything VsCode can. In fact I think I've been pretty open that you should use whatever tool suits the job and and my argument has been that for software development VIM is just as good as vsCode. The fact that you want to keep your jscad inside VS code is your personal preference, you can just as easily keep in the browser and switch between the terminal an browser. I don't get your need to die on the smallest of hills to be right but if that's all you want then go be right. I couldn't care less.