Glowstick @ Glowstick @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

241

Joined

2 yr. ago

This is not a valid argument. We literally evolved to use tools. And humans absolutely can eat raw meat

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/blogs/national-museum-of-natural-history/2021/12/09/meet-the-scientist-studying-how-humans-started-eating-meat/

I don't know then, that sounds very standard

Where's is the original image from? What file format is it?

Now it works!

Yeah it's just showing the broken image icon

Broken link on lemmy.world

For many many years even low end Android phones can perfectly run emulated game systems that came out a decade or two after atari, so cpu probably isn't a bottleneck at all

atari hasn't been the original company called atari in a long time, it's just a brand name that has been bought and sold

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atari

Hah nah, you were totally right

Sorry, i deleted my comment like 10 seconds after posting because i googled it and saw i was incorrect. A few years ago Apple added a camera APP to the watch that remote controls your phone camera, but didn't actually add a camera to the watch. I misremembered, my bad

It's true that this is how most consumers act. It's dumb, but iirc it's factually correct.

If you take a brand name shirt, remove the logo in a way that is visually perfect, and sell them side-by-side, then the logo shirt will outsell the non-logo shirt. Or so I've heard.

I agreed with op, then i read your astute response and now I don't know which position is correct.

Thinking it through as i type... If you photoshopped an image of Tom Hanks giving a thumbs up to your product, that would clearly be illegal, but if you hired an exact flawless lookalike impersonator of Tom Hanks and had him pose for a picture with a thumbs up to your product, would that be illegal? I think it might still be illegal, because you purposely hired a lookalike impersonator to gain the benefit of Tom Hanks' brand.

I think the law on AI should match what the law says about impersonators. If hiring an indistinguishable celebrity impersonator to use in media is legal, then ai soundalikes should be legal too, and vice versa.

Even in the hypothetical maximal fully built out ultimate version, what was this device supposed to be able to do that a smartwatch with a voice assistant couldn't do?

There's no official order. Different sources have them in different orders

As the actual headline itself says, this is a niche. The editorialized lemmy headline makes it sound like much more than that. Dumb phones still exist, but not many people choose to buy them

If a private citizen from a western country decided to go to Iran against all of the highest level warnings, then i have to sympathy for them.

I've heard (don't know if it's true) that in the old days if you survived a hanging then you were allowed to live

Good

I would bet the pot might be useful in specific situations, like if it's used mostly to be tipped over at its original location without having to be carried anywhere first