Glowstick @ Glowstick @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

241

Joined

2 yr. ago

Can you give an example?

In what way is the hardware locked down? Is this something new with the M chips?

This is almost exactly my opinion

I don't remember at this point, it was 4 8 years ago

I voted for her, but i seriously held my nose while doing it. I volunteered for Obama, but i didn't for Hilary. I was demotivated by the polls saying she was a sure thing, and by me seriously not liking her as a person and many of her political positions. She was obviously way better than Trump, but man was she a crappy candidate.

She frequently demonstrates exactly why she didn't get elected.

Quote right from the opening paragraph:

it is important to understand the level of physical fitness/performance [trans] individuals possess relative to their cisgender counterparts. Unfortunately, there are few studies investigating this topic, and several complications that confound this research.

I absolutely won't sit down. You don't have any authority to silence people, neither from a power perspective nor a moral perspective. You need to grow up and learn how to have a discussion with people you disagree with.

On a personal level and I've been very friendly and engaging in serious discussion with other people. And on the subject matter I've been very clear, on-topic, rational, understanding, and providing of citations for my claims. You should learn how to do it.

I can't believe OP actually said it:

dO yOUr OwN ResEArcH!

The most classic stereotypical retort of someone who doesn't know what they're talking about and is trying to deflect because they know they're unable to support their claim

If it could be done in a reasonable way then I'd be totally fine with that

There have only been 4 known transgender Olympic athletes so far.

And of those 4 it seems like none of them are born-male people who are now competing in a women's event, which is the only situation where the trans person would have an advantage.

https://thesportsgrail.com/list-of-the-transgender-athletes-competing-at-tokyo-olympics-2020/

There have only been 4 known transgender Olympic athletes so far.

And of those 4 it seems like none of them are born-male people who are now competing in a women's event, which is the only situation where the trans person would have an advantage.

https://thesportsgrail.com/list-of-the-transgender-athletes-competing-at-tokyo-olympics-2020/

If i had to guess I'd say it's simply numbers. Compared to the rest of the population, trans people are extremely rare, and so there likely just haven't been enough trans people to have been there yet.

So you're saying there shouldn't be separate males and females events, there should only be a single all-entrants event

Stop labeling people anti-trans just because they disagree with you about the mechanics of a zero-sum competition situation. The majority of people here are PRO-TRANS, and ALSO pro-women. We all just want the system that provides the most fairness in a situation where there's no way for it to be completely fair to everyone.

If there are 10 seats on a team, every spot taken by a person means that a different person doesn't get that spot. So we as a caring society have to decide who CAN get that seat, and also who CAN'T get that seat. It all comes down to whether or not women born with biologically male bodies have a physical advantage over women born with biologically female bodies. At the very minimum, people who went through male puberty have a physical advantage over people who didn't go through male puberty.

That article says there's no such thing as fully discreet categories of male and female. True!

So we either have to separate athletes into two separate categories of biological male and female that applies to 99% of people in order to give biological females a chance to compete at all, -OR- we have to say that since the biological male/female categorization system doesn't apply to 100% of people then there is no basis for separate male/female sports and everyone just competes in a single event, in which case the only people who get to be on the team will wind up being close to 100% cis or trans males, with essentially no females ever getting to do professional sports.

The categories are sex segregated, not gender segregated. The names of the competitions are from a time when most people didn't know there was a difference between man/male and woman/female. So when it's called like "men's sprint" the actual meaning is "male's sprint". If you wanted to make the official names of the competitions to be called "male's" and "female's" instead of "men's" and "women's" then I would totally try to help you in that movement

She isn't a man, but her body is at least partially male. That's the definition of trans.

Unfortunately, no amount of medical interventions are able to completely transform a person's body to be exactly the same as a person who was born with a body of the opposite sex.

I know I'm gonna catch heat for this, but sex-segregated physical competitions is one of the very few places where trans women shouldn't be treated the same. Women's sports competitions aren't segregated by gender, they're segregated by sex. Trans women are women in gender, but their body isn't a biologically female body. That's the exact definition of transgender - when your body's biological sex doesn't match your sense of gender. So by definition, trans women don't have a biologically female body.

The whole point of sex-segregated sports is for people with female bodies to be able to have a fair competition, instead of them not even getting a chance to compete at all because if they had to compete against biological males then almost 100% of females wouldn't even make the team. This is the whole reason why sports competitions are segregated by sex.

TLDR trans women should always be treated as women - except for sex-segregated physical competitions

We don't have to imagine it, humans are often just as awful to other humans