Mhhh, I find the art styles fitting. Objects not going behind others is a common mistake and so is crippled dino hands. The background being different was the only thing for me.
I think it's easier to remember in the negative form: They don't want to be called a woman, so why risk your teeth and call them a transwoman. (For AFAB)
Also: stallman is a character and has been associated with a pedophelia/ebephilia yikes semi reasonable Epstein takes and a lack of understanding that consenting sex with a minor causes harm.
"Critical Thinker" Yikes. Somehow the right made that a forbidden word in my mind because they hide behind that as an excuse for asking terrible questions etc.
Anyway. Allegedly the statistics are rather mediocre for self driving cars. But sadly I haven't seen a good statistic about that, either. The issue here is that automatable tasks are lower risk driving situations so having a good statistic is near impossible. E.g. miles driven are heavily skewed when you are only used on highways as a driver. There are no simple numbers that will tell you anything of worth.
That being said the title should be about the mistake that happened without fundamental statements (i.e. self driving is bad because motorcyclists die).
To be fair: Beyond reasonable doubt is the highest certainty.
It is probably impossible to achieve that for some of the things you might justifiably deport someone.
The clear and convincing proof part is also plainly ignored, so that's not the issue. The issue is a government that will execute its agenda no matter the law. You cannot stop that within the law as it is void.
That's not always good. Maybe they just did not read the handle and assumed someone random asked, but didn't know they wanted this library. That's probably a good assumption, too.
Mhhh, I find the art styles fitting. Objects not going behind others is a common mistake and so is crippled dino hands. The background being different was the only thing for me.