GigglyBobble @ GigglyBobble @kbin.social

Posts

0

Comments

341

Joined

2 yr. ago

How do they break the law? The opt-in forces them to ask you first and that's what the annoying banners do. Sites that don't care about tracking also don't show these pop-ups.

Or, you know, use neither.

Old shitheads tend to be annoyingly resilient, unfortunately.

If you think any socialist politician would behave differently, you're just naive. Look at every socialist ever. Don't think they care about you just because they publish a good-sounding agenda.

Politicians don't give a fuck about the middle class though. To get rich after holding public office, you need to get in bed with the currently rich

Even if they are not completely corrupt: it's easier to talk to a couple of mega corp CEOs instead of those of thousands of small companies (who employ the most people in total). So policy will always favor large corps. And that's where the obscenely rich are.

“Researchers say” isn't something researchers say though but journalists or "journalists" (bloggers etc).

Read their arguments above. Also, is it this Andrew Dobson? An academic but hardly an expert on the nuclear physics.

But it does carry more weight. If a celibrity voices an opinion it's almost guaranteed to become public.

That doesn't make it more valid though, it can still be bullshit. And that's why people may conclude it best, if performers focus on their area of expertise. I don't think less of people coming to that conclusion.

Or you might believe just because they're a great performer doesn't mean they have more expertise on a topic outside their area than the average Joe and is just as interesting. Yet, somehow people's opinion seems to matter more once they're in the spotlight.

Eventually all content will just be AI generated on the fly. No need to keep dumb content on precious storage that could be used to increase model size.

And what will happen? Didn't Q-Anon start fighting a supposed pedo ring in a pizza place? They'll totally turn on Trump now, right? Right?

Ex-smokers are the most militant non-smokers. Why would it be different for ex Windows users/victims?

Yep. 2023 still has a week to let the world go to shit for good.

Well, not really. Your first reply to me got downvoted because you setup a strawman - arguing against something that wasn't even the point.

Your second, the one you claimed said the same as mine, insinuated Dark Matter is just some mathy explanation among many. This doesn't give it credit. It's the current no 1 explanation with lots of evidence. Still didn't get downvoted though.

Nobody "automatically assumes" anything. Dark matter is the best candidate of possible explanations because it explains observation and still fits the standard model. Even if they find the necessary particles eventually, nobody would call it certain though. Certainty is a unicorn.

Its observed gravitational effects is evidence. Otherwise nobody would have given it a name.

It's about generators which certainly should not be trained with such material.

People don't think about that. You have to register somewhere in order to use your $12.99 cam, install some app and are good to go.

How would a someone not interested in tech know that the footage data is stored on some online server and you are at the mercy of their itsec.

And now Bob next door pushes his shit first and you have an extra hour fixing conflicts.