Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)GI
Posts
0
Comments
341
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • balks at the cost of opening a nuclear powerplant without significant government guarantees and subsidies, that should tell you something.

    It tells of sane business, yes. The German government is completely unreliable with regards to nuclear power. Remember, a CDU chancellor eventually shut them down - the supposed right party that used to fight for prolonged lifetime of the plants. Any sane businessperson would request legal safety before making a huge investment that only pays off over decades.

  • Your quote is worthless, that summary doesn't give any reason what's problematic about the browser.

    It's also unfortunate that the article's author chose to start with politics - I prefer technical reasons to stop using technical tools.

    The crypto bullshit and injection of affiliate codes to URLs are indeed problematic. However, to me that just says to stay vigilant when using Brave but it's still not as bad as Chrome.

    Personally I use Firefox anyway but unfortunately, webdevs get lazier every year and only test Chromium browsers and sometimes some stupid website doesn't work correctly on Firefox. If it's something like an airline checkout I need a fallback browser and today that's Brave.

  • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare for example runs Ricochet Anti-Cheat on kernel level which fundamentally contradicts Linux architecture and will never run.

    Easy Anti-Cheat is an example where the devs gave in paving the way to a proton addon which allows you to play Apex, for example.

  • I had an iPhone 12 for two weeks before I returned it. I tried to like it because, while you're still in a corp walled garden and they cannot really be trusted, they so far are better than Google at least with regards to privacy.

    However, there's a list of stuff that got me too annoyed. Some examples:

    • the stock keyboard is just garbage. All the infamous typos on social media come from iPhones because they choose to correct words that have already been written. You also cannot sensibly replace the stock keyboard because you cannot block a specific app's data usage and keyboards are far too critical apps to grant internet access.
    • stock apps are good overall (better than Android) but that means people don't make replacements. The mail app could've been great but they choose to not support PGP and it's practically impossible to set up.
    • you cannot replace Safari completely, some apps still open it. Safari is crap because no way to install adblock.
    • you still feel that iOS wasn't developed as a multi-threading system. I had a few apps that wouldn't correctly work while in background
    • apps are far more expensive than for Android. Lots of subscription-based plans, more comparable to full-price PC software than mobile apps.
    • no native file system access. Apps are sandboxed and handle their files themselves. I prefer to do that myself but no chance on iOS.
    • the community is garbage. Every question or critcisim is the user's fault. The Holy Corp does not make mistakes. Collective Stockholm syndrome.

    I also ran into various bugs. I do on every platform but the "it just works" narrative is especially strong for Apple and it's just not like their fans claim.

  • I’d recommend either Signal, Matrix, or XMPP over Telegram/Facebook(Meta).

    Yes, me too. This whole discussion gave the impression that WhatsApp Telegram and while this may be true the unfortunately very high adoption of WhatsApp made me argue against it. I'm well aware that Telegram isn't an alternative but the ones you mentioned are (personally I use Signal and even got a significant amount of people convinced to st least run it in parallel).