They don't need belief and faith, they need to trust it. Something that both Republicans and Democrats have eroded because it didn't fit their narrative.
The evidence should convince people.Scientists are failing to adequately communicate with the public.
There's a little bit in a hypothesisNot in a properly formed hypothesis.You shouldn't have faith in anything in science.
Science doesn't require belief.The problem is that people believe in religion, and their religious leaders have a vested interest in keeping them dumb.
Nature has charged crazy fees to publish and view work.I'm pretty sure it's greed.Information should be freely accessible to the public.
What do you think are the worst carbon causing human activities? What do you think are the most beneficial activities to counter carbon output?
What do you think are the worst carbon causing human activities? What do you think are the most beneficial activities to counter carbon output?
Honestly, capitalism.The whole damn consume consume consume mindset. The idea that things are discarded instead of being repaired or properly recycled.
Fuck will always be there at least a few times as long as my favorite software package exists. https://github.com/nvbn/thefuck
They don't need belief and faith, they need to trust it. Something that both Republicans and Democrats have eroded because it didn't fit their narrative.