Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)GE
Posts
0
Comments
804
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • If you don't know a term you look it up or you ask. Like you should probably do for "gatekeeping"

    You don't turn around and go. "who made this term a five year old, oh wait executives are five year olds".

    That's being a dick because they are proudly showing off their ignorance and colossal ego.

  • rule

    Jump
  • does nothing

    Jesus fucking Christ G*mers just can't admit their Lord GabeN did the same shit they bitch about Electronic Arse and Ubishit doing to consolidate his monopoly.

  • even if it was proved,

    Massa isn't doing this near 15 years later for no reason. It comes from a Bernie Ecclestone interview where he admits to not investigating allegations until the end of the season when the results can't be changed.

    Unlike giving a driver a 20 seconds penalty for driving at racing speed after the race is over. This is an example of actual FIA corruption.

  • I know F1 fans need to get their daily Fuck the FIA. But you cannot be serious.

    Driving at racing speed on a track considered not live, with the potential of marshalls and other track staff on the other side of the barriers. Is generally frowned upon.

    Intentional wrecking is also harshly punished. There's a reason you don't see it outside the very low levels.

    Magnusson got a ten second penalty and three points. Perez may have "only" gotten five seconds and one point. But both of these incidents happened on a live track during a race session.

    Trying to make any connection between the penalties is a pointless endeavour.