GarrulousBrevity @ GarrulousBrevity @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

81

Joined

2 yr. ago

Please, be reasonable:

 dotnet

    
return post.Contains("Twitter") || post.Contains("elon") ?  "loser" : "cool"; 

  

Mine is just running stock, but depending on what you're trying to do with it I could imagine that a few things might not be palatable to some.

1. The read only by default file system
2. It kinda nukes everything on the system on update
3. So much of how it handles the Linux side user profiles depends on there only being the default user

Either this is implying that Linux users are hiding who they are to fit in, and Windows users are comfortable in their own skin, or this is just transphobic as fuck.

If it's the former, this may be the wrong sub for you. If it's the latter, this may be the wrong world for you.

But it would make the rich richer, which makes it a good bet. I think the only thing that would stop private companies being allowed to develop beachfront property in the strip is if it were to turn out to be less profitable.

But that's true of all governments that aren't really looking out for their people.

You accept, must the frog

Good luck with that, granddragon88

That's a cool narrative you made up. You actually aren't required to have your birth year in your username on most sites.

As someone who shares your birth year, I think you gotta accept that the HH meaning is enough of a stain to avoid putting it in your usernames

The headline doesn't say that

I know this is what-about-ism but I really wish we cared half as much about Meta having already destabilized the last two presidential elections.

I don't think I've hated reading something I so emphatically agreed with before

I really thought this was going to end with you saying immigration is the flood of your metaphor which causes every other problem in this country.

This has not been picked up by any reputable sources. Mostly because I don't believe it just happened. According to Code Pink, who organized the protest being filmed, this event happened in October, and the protester who the comment was directed to is on Day 8 of a fast, which probably means this event did not happen yesterday. Though this is also very heavily biased reporting.

The daily wire is reposting it as news to drum up ire and views. It should still be a red flag when only one source is posting something, and it should prompt you to dig a little deeper.

That said, it seems pretty likely that this is something she really said a few months ago, and that mixed with her recent interviews where she blames Russia... It's not great.

It should be a red flag that only one news source is reporting it.

You don't know what to do with the three seashells?

What if you don't intend to see someone before New Year's and want to wish them a happy New Year as well, while being lazy?

I really don't get this hatred for "Happy Holidays", because even if you want to discredit the non Christian holidays in December/January, there are still two...

Froot*

My understanding of why a lot of people come to communities like this is that... We could be living in a post-scarcity society. There is enough. We just don't distribute it. We prioritize growing the wealth of a few dozen insanely rich people with the labor of everyone else. Which means we prioritize making the majority of people work shit jobs for next to nothing doing jobs of dubious value to society.

Cero!

For what it's worth, at no point was I trying to misinterpret what you're saying. I actually, really, appreciate your thoughts on this. I don't entirely agree with your tactic, but I get it.

Mostly, I think you friendly fire regularly. Sometimes, I really think people don't get what you mean, because there was ambiguity. Sometimes you attack someone before they've made a point to disagree with. In this particular thread, the whole thing started with:

Care to share any evidence towards the kicks being triggered by olfactory overload?

Maybe I'm assuming good intent, but I don't see a reason to assume that's someone doubting you, over someone looking for some reading on cats. I made fun of you for you calling him ignorant with a copy and paste of a message you used on me, and I definitely didn't have a point in the argument, and I definitely don't see how any amount of reading comprehension of your earlier messages would have gotten me to a place of understanding that you were trying to out belligerent me.

I would argue that asking for clarification or examples is not inherently disingenuous. It can be, but it's also a requirement for healthy discussion. You are equally punishing well-intentioned curiosity. I suspect you maybe enjoy being abrasive more than your explanation accounts for... but I get that it's sort of a bit, and you're doing okay.

I'm slightly concerned that you'll push people away from the platform. The kind of trolling you're doing is really hard to distinguish from the kind of trolling that makes Internet forums only really accessible to able bodied cis white males

Your go-to seems to be some real ableist bullshit. This thread was about cats, and I'm not exactly sure we need to gatekeep it to people who hold up to your expectations for debating acumen.