I deleted all my posts and stopped using the place almost entirely. I go back, like, once a month because I moderate a niche subreddit that I haven't been able to find a home for on Lemmy.
System scanning: EGS is known to automatically scan your system and send your data back to them. While this seems to be the same type of analytics Steam does occasionally, in Steam's case, it's opt-in, and done with full, informed consent.
Paid exclusives: Epic has been known to pay publishers to make their games artificially exclusive to their own store. They regularly claim this money is to support the development of the games in question, but this is easily disproven, as they've been seen buying games known to be complete more than once. Additionally, this has resulted in bait-and-switch-like situations, where users would prepurchase Steam copies of games, only to be informed that they wouldn't be getting them.
Publisher-centric behavior: Another user here claimed that EGS is pro-developer and anti-consumer, but this is only half true. This only rings true in the case of self-published games. There have been cases of developers getting unwarranted backlash after aforementioned bait-and-switches, when they were just as surprised to learn about all the "development support" they received as anyone.
Tim Sweeney: Tim Weeney, the CEO of Epic, is an asshole. A giant, narcissistic, hateful shitbag. Just look at his Twitter, the dudes a giant POS.
Ew. Can't say I'm super surprised, though. IIRC, the dev started pushing to further monetize these apps a while back by making the original versions harder to access. I mean, getting money for their work isn't a bad thing, of course, but those are some gross and uncaring ways to do it.
So... Basically just tangentially linux-related. Also, Xenia wasn't the original mascot. Tux came first, and Xenia was proposed as an alternative, but never took off.
This is kinda like Windows with the "We don't recognize this application" message. Letting it scan will probably just help other users avoid this annoyance in the future. You can also shut off play protect from the play store settings.
Sorry, but that's a naive perspective itself. Knowledge of advanced topics and maturity don't necessarily go hand-in-hand. For instance, my first plunge into such topics was in 2007 at age 11.
Your typing and mannerisms are very child-like, and your responses show a naivety indicative of immaturity. Not an insult, just an observation, but I did see your post a few days ago, and the statement "Xenia wouldn't say that," struck me as... Prepubescent.
They admitted they were slowing users with ad blockers, but many Firefox users reported experiencing the slowdown regardless of whether they used an ad blocker.
The article I linked, however, says that they couldn't get the delay to happen at all, so it's entirely possible it was just so poorly implemented that it was affecting people almost at random.
Except that they've already displayed that they won't. Recently, Firefox users were targeted with an artificial delay on YouTube. When caught, they claimed it was about ad blockers... Except it didn't affect chrome users with adblock and affected Firefox users without adblock.
And this has happened multiple times over the years, where little headaches and inconveniences would crop up on Google services, all of which could be fixed by changing your user agent so the site thinks you're running chrome.
Ganbat @ Ganbat @lemmyonline.com Posts 3Comments 325Joined 2 yr. ago
So this is Scott Pilgrim?