Galluf @ Galluf @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

81

Joined

2 yr. ago

That's because they're such an important and pleasure able part of life. Especially sunshine and UV exposure.

There's things you can do to reduce the risk, but most people would be worse off by trying to completely avoid them altogether.

I disagree with that analogy. There's a very noticable difference between how the cars goes (and sounds) among those fuel types. They may all get you to your destination, but the experience is moderately different.

And maybe that actually makes it a good analogy. I'm not really sure.

And even within imax, there's differing qualities of the projector. It's all quite complicated and seems to be intentionally obfuscated.

What do you think you're supposed to do after rating spicy buffalo wings that make your nose run?

Sure there's some settings where you don't do it (or do it quietly). Many restaurants are also loud enough that you won't even hear it unless you're listening to it.

It seems to me to be worse manners to just leave your snot as leaking out or making you sniffle. Better to get it over with rather than make people listen to that for minutes to hours.

I'm not following why you think that's in contrast with what I've said. I agree that simple life being everywhere is more likely than complex being anywhere.

It seems to me that simple life being anywhere could be unlikely enough.

It's not fine if it's what's used in the title. It's fine to include it as part of the post, but only including the surface temp in the title is misleading.

That's been true, but I wouldn't expect the year over year differences of phones to continue indefinitely.

Advances were very rapid when it was a nascent industry, but it's already slowed down significantly. It will slow more by 2027.

It's not as of right now, but I wouldn't say downvotes are the issue. The reality is that downvote = disagree no matter what rule you create that says it doesn't.

What I'm talking about are the insults, mischaracterizations, and general non productive discussion on comments that others don't agree with.

I'm not convinced of this. It could also be that it's also that unfathomably likely to like to develop and evolve.

Yep. Unless you're trying to cook eggs on the ground, then you can start letting people know when it finally gets hot enough to do that.

If you really want to test it, then you've got to post an opinion that disagrees with both of the two main dominant opinions and is a bit more complex rather than just staunchly for/against something.

So say that you're against abortion, except advocate strongly for it in the event of rape or mental disabilities. And say that you're not against gay people, but against same sex marriage and gay people should just be celibate their whole lives.

And if you really want to ruffle some feather, say that you don't think pedophiles should be put in jail. Only child molesters/rapists should be jailed.

That hasn't been my experience.

It's still a very mixed reaction if you say something contrary to the dominant opinion.

And still just as likely to get strawmanned if you disagree with an aspect, but still overall agree with the conclusion.

Nope, not at all. You completely misunderstood my point.

I'm not saying the ground suddenly got hotter and everything else stayed the same. In this case, it's just a metric that's quoted because it has a misleading high value especially by people who are just scrolling through.

It's click bait.

Being friendly is far more effective than trying to punish people to make them agree with you. Especially when there's no immediate and obvious consequence of their individual actions.

I wouldn't say that at all. Chernobyl was so much worse than this. It wasn't a single first line supervisor who asked one worker to do something who said no at first.

They'd asked multiple nuclear plants to perform that test. Been told that it was not safe to perform multiple times. They finally got an upper management individual at one plant to agree to it. Then they had challenges completing the test and due to plant characteristics that were not apparent to the operators (as well as violating other procedures) the event occurred.

The premise of chernobyl is a series of systemic failures of barriers. Not an addition of a single step not specified in a maintenence procedure.

My advice is don't hesitate to just read the wiki/cliff notes on the chapters if things start dragging on for you. It's worth finishing, but some of the middle books have so little that happens.

Talking about surface temperature is pretty misleading.

Thank you for your acknowledgement that you're unwilling to look at this situation with the level of nuance required.

Not at all. It's the exact opposite.

I want other kids to be able to have similar experiences with working and earning money.