GaMEChld @ GaMEChld @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

689

Joined

2 yr. ago

I think they might also need to maybe leave work at a reasonable time.

If I had to liken ADHD to computer terms, I think I would blame a faulty task scheduler. That's what issues the threads to the CPU. When Ryzen came out and also when Intel moved to Performance and Efficiency cores there were issues with efficient task scheduling.

I might be a little obsessed with efficiency. Possibly due to my issues making me inefficient by nature, I tend to seek efficiency wherever I can, like some mirage in the desert of my mind.

You just need a way to rationalize it. For me, I focused on the fact that the praise the Warrior of Light usually receives is in the vein of never giving up, not that they are just plain powerful. As such, I don't view my character as any more powerful than any of the Scions, or Raubahn. I think the narrative of Shadowbringers and Endwalker support that idea. That fight with Zeno's at the end was just pure willpower at the end, neither had any strength left and they still fought till they couldn't move.

Download more RAM. My working memory is shit (ADHD).

Compassion fatigue is a thing. You can try for some Buddhist state of Nirvana that would likely take a lifetime to pursue... Or you can start curating your input. Stop doom scrolling, look for positive science news and the like. There's plenty of positivity out there still, it's just not algorithm friendly.

He curates his input and surrounds himself with sycophants to give him the skewed view of reality that he prefers.

It's permanently got the McDonald's app loaded.

If only some Anonymous hacktivists were to take on this task!

Maybe they can tolerate heat but are weak to cold. Summon the apiarists!

Don't bees actually generate heat? They can like cook invading wasps to death.

"It's times like these I ponder the immortal words of Socrates who said... 'I drank what?!'

Yeah, that may be true. Some people have their minds made up and they somehow think any further discussion is somehow a weakening of their position or something like that.

I like to think that any fear of discussion simply means you're afraid your reasons aren't sound and you don't want to question the reality that you may be acting on emotions rather than reason. I think you can definitely have this discussion rationally and still end up supporting what happened.

Sure, but that's on them. Taking a deal is always in the hands of the defendant. But if it looks like public opinion is on their side and the concept of jury Nullification has become common knowledge, that might be enough to substantially swing what's offered in those plea deals. Prosecutor might be generous to avoid the jury letting them off Scott free.

This is the smartest solution. Order and aesthetics simultaneously!

Much easier just to shoot the individual than the plane I think. Maybe I'm wrong. I imagine a 50 cal sniper would fuck up a plane. But planes can glide. Hypothetically speaking.

Jury Nullification is my right.

Conversely, this also means you value your honor that little.

I understand what you're saying. The answer is yes, we choose when violence is justified.

Lemmy doesn't do well with nuanced discussion. The communication dilemma present is the lack of the bridge between where one party in the discussion wants to continue narrowing the parameters of discussion until we are left with a binary choice (the quantum side of discussion) and the other party wants to keep the discussion broad and cognizant of all the variables (the general relativity side of discussion).

Both sides have valid reasons for existing. Usually you do have to narrow parameters in order to actually come up with a solution or action to implement. Similarly to how in a valid experiment you attempt to control all variables except what you're testing. But you also have to be aware of all the variables in the first place to adequately control them.