Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)GB
Posts
1
Comments
5,350
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • It's a bad gene. It's literally the contextually appropriate description of a factor involved in a situation.

    Sorry it hurts your feelings

    We've both made our points and opinions known here.

  • I mean if it's a damaged or failed it's a bad gene. It caused ms!

    It's not shitting on a person, it's discussing a condition.

    I can understand that discussion can lead to eugenics style thoughts.

    "Oh that person has tons of bad genes, they therefore are bad". That's wrong though, a person can have a super fucked up body but it doesn't change their value or goodness.

    When discussing a condition, the genes that improve or cause that condition can be described as good or bad.

    Context matters.

  • It's an article about curing baldness, all context is pre determined.

    Like sure, if we're just bringing anything up, why care about baldness when I can't breathe underwater, or if I can't raise the dead?

  • He is not rich. He is well off at best (as I said, at the very end of a prestigious career). Other people are just very very poor. But the gap between him and the poor is tiny compared to the gap between him and musk and co

  • He ain't rich. He's experienced, the top of his industry and at the end of his career. He's accrued decent wealth given those life details but frankly it's TINY for how he clearly could have spent his life.

    He's not rich, he's successful and at the finish line.

  • He's a pedigreed professional at the top of his field at the end of his career. Literally a world class statesmen regardless of if you favor his positions. Why wouldn't such a person be worth 5-10 mil? He earned his position which can be with a strong salary... For decades. Even tame investments in the whole market would steer him handily towards that worth

    That doesn't even touch on the mountain of social good and enrichment and support of the poor that he has directly contributed to over his career

  • But that's just moving the goalpost, so to speak. You've just built a different parenting framework that requires you to stick around. You're still hunting the same goal: self sufficient offspring

    (Not negging you)

  • If the topic is undesired head hair loss, "bad" appropriately describes the genes that may contribute to that. The discussion is limited by the context to avoiding hair loss, it isn't a universal conversation on cosmetics