You wanna do it, trust me
Well ironically that's perfect communication here.
I don't know how a calamari could be ring shaped, and i might be tired, but anyway my brain can think of it is just hilarious.
Dyslexia is common, but people for whom english is not their first language, whose learning is still in progress. Those are even more common on the internet.
True, the folder is pretty easy to find and always the same.
Although the big problem is how quickly that folder can get messy.
Mine is filled with so much pdf files that i never want to sort, sometimes there's duplicates because i didn't want to scroll to find the first one so i downloaded it a second time.
When i was a kid i was sleeping on my stomach and i'd have my hands on each thigh, arms tucked in, so the weight of my torso was more on my arms than my thorax for better breathing.
But then i grew down there and that got uncomfortable, so i bent one knee for the room and the hand can't be put on my thighs. So now i bend each arm and put them under the pillow, also shifting my weight on the one opposing my bent knee.
That's kind of an in between stomach and side but of course letter on i also adopted the side position to switch to, mostly because of my back getting old.
In the same cathartic relief idea i also remember finishing both god of wars on ps2 as a kid. Worked great as anger management too. I feel like doom as a very similar energy in that regards.
I all use a lot of rational thinking daily, so i do like a game that take all of your focus but i'd rather have something brain dead. So in short, rocket league. (Also MHW can be like that sometimes)
I was born handicapped, i don't have xray vision.
Do you think it's false? Because unless you don't get it i'm not sure i'm interested in formulating logically a trivia.
And it's not always a problem. When is it not, only if it's balanced by making a plus-value on that work. And of course if its done within some ethical rules. (For exemple no slavery.) That plus-value is what's better for moderately rich people who can create jobs and services without the problems that most very rich creates...
I think all the services you quoted would have been implemented either way. Some like cars for example might have been at the expense of better ways. An exemple is how, in the us, highways replaced the railroad system for profit.
In general, the way they implemented those solutions was through corruption like that and unethical work condition. (And it goes beyond the service they got rich on, to what they are doing currently too)
Moreover this idea of selling things at the (highest) price people are willing to buy is a great factor in creating many of thoses problems.
It's the same logic that makes work conditions unethical. That includes using worker in other countries wich conditions are literally considered unethical in the country the goods are sold. But to a lesser degree also the bad conditions of work in many field.
Taking healthcare as a exemple, how do you expect a nurse to sell her work at a higher price. If you want a nurse to give the best service to society or even be ethical, you can't raise the price?
So it goes either way, either healthcare become expensive. Or like in my country, it's free, but the conditions becomes worse and worse. Both being bad for society.
So maybe not the goal, but a goal of society is to distribute those resources correctly. Simply because it's necessary for us to live together.
Because we have limited resources, no riches can come to you without profiting of the work of others. If you really want to get your own view you can just look for yourself how rich people got their wealth and judge by yourself is that normal.
I meant that for the extremely wealthy to be precise.
Some moderately rich people are actually contributing positively. They are examples of what capitalism used to be, a system that wasn't perfect but could still lead society in a positive direction, sometimes better than the alternatives.
Redistribution of resources only works to some extent. Not to redistribute all the wealth in one go sure, but to balance the inequity continuously. For exemple taxe on income could be such a way. And like you said some rich people are ok with it and are philanthropic even.
But the true goal of society would be to distribute riches correctly in the first place. So we don't have to rely on philanthropy.
And yeah i don't think capitalism distribute it correctly. So it's theirs in our capitalistic society, but it isn't rightfully in my opinion.
My point of view is that the money all capitalist have is a resource that was taken from the rest of us. So donating all of it back would just be the bare minimum someone can do.
After donating all of it back, you're right we also need to figure out a plan to distribute it properly in the first place, and most important make a system and society that's gonna provide for everyone.
And no kidding no one found a answer to that, from the beginning of human society we only very briefly achieved some systems that's almost there. But no one never had the answer. There is always some problems in any society.
What i know for sure is that capitalism is not only not the answer, but is actually a system that's getting more and more corrupted, with increasing problems. To the point it's leading us directly to a wall.
So in all the different view we can have of the world, all the different system we can use for society, there is no right system, there is worse than capitalism, but there is also better. I strive for not the definitive best, just better...
Isn't any tyrants left in the west, the system is the one being tyrannical. No head will fall and capitalism will end.
And the system is revolt proof. So it doesn't care for the people one bit. Hence it can call anything good for the population "Socialism", as in the enemy.
Capitalism was good but it's time let it go, it failed us.
Exactly what defines us is the sitting down and setting our wits to something.
Sometimes it's horror, sometimes it's greatness.
But everytime it's more prominent than anything other animals can do.
Because wits is the trait that succeed in evolution, it's the trait that gives you more agency.
!= isn't universal, i've mostly seen it used in programming.
Otherwise ≠ is the symbol we use in maths and generally the more common one.
=/= is just the worst rendition of ≠ for people that don't know how to write it or are too lazy to go find it.
That's some w science rizz right there!
Circuses isn't socialism, it's a pretty useful tool of capitalism, even though it ruins it in some cases.
Bread though, no capitalist will ever share their bread. Or anything for that matter.
Also that's bad advice, i already know i'm gonna ignore the games i brought and installed but put to latter. Choosing among your favorites and go to games is what's really hard.
Palworld next gen
To be fair, culture is always extremely slowly for everything, when it's going forward in the first place.
As for clinical research, i'd say the field is what's new. So i don't expect it to be quicker than common sense before a century at least.
I know the cables fit, 'cause i watched them pull away.