Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)FR
Posts
1
Comments
1,244
Joined
3 mo. ago

  • The phrasing is only stupid if you are trying to have an issue with it. Obviously you and the person you're chatting to can read your messages. That doesn't need to be said, it's inferred.

    End to End Encryption is easy. Why do you guys all seem to think it's hard?

  • Most recently, the new DOGE has suffered substantial security lapses,

    Did they? What? The made up ones where people claimed that DOGE gave russian hackers access to databases despite DOGE never even requesting access to their systems?

    Even before Twitter was aquired, Twitter had an embarrassing memorable history with public figures suffering from security incidents caused by Twitter’s own staff, training, technology or processes.

    Funny that you say this after you said this:

    Musk routinely hires young unqualified technicians, and abused, laid off, or otherwise alienated much of the top talent at Twitter, in the name of cost savings.

    So twitters staff, training, technology and processes were the source of these embarrassing incidents.......but then Musk shouldn't have gotten rid of them?

    but could be disasterous for anyone relying on this new E2EE solution, if it is incorrectly implemented.

    And there's nothing to say that it is incorrectly implemented other than hopes and dreams by people who want it to be.

    The talent needed to correctly implement secure end to end encryption is rare, on a good day, for a good employer with a strong history of loyalty to their staff.

    Absolutely not true lol. Secure end to end encryption is a solved problem. It's not hard to implement.

  • Are you? Because X is the only platform that's legally fighting against government ordered censorship. X is the only social media platform that pretty much only bans you if you break the law, instead of banning you the second you question the echo chambers preferred message.

  • What are you basing your doubts on? When has X under Musk had anything happen to doubt their encryption? You think the guy fighting for free speech and ending people getting in trouble for what they say is going to lie about this?

  • Maybe the mods should add another rule to the sidebar saying only negative X posts are allowed, since that's clearly all the "community" wants lol.

    The fact this is being treated as bad news is unbelievable.

  • Pointing out that LGB being defined as same sex attraction while TQ+ is based on gender identity is “ignorance and intolerance” now?

    People were saying that being gay has nothing to do with sex now, only gender lol.

    Let me ask you - do you think that sexual orientation is innate or do you think it’s just a preference that you can control and change at will?

  • No.

    I just got insta permabanned from world news @ quokka au for saying that sexual orientation is based on sex not gender, is innate, and can’t be changed. You know……scientific facts. People are now claiming that being gay is a choice that you can just opt out of.

    We’ve gone full circle to conversion camps and “pray the gay away” being believed to be effective. Insane.

  • What are you talking about “temporal+quality” for DLSS? That’s not a thing.

    DLSS I’m talking about. There are many comparisons out there showing how amazing it is, often resulting in better IQ than native.

    FXAA is not an AI upscaler, what are you talking about?

  • “All your data” lol

    I care about my actual private data. My email that I hand out to dozens of sites isn’t that. What movies/tv shows of Plex’s - not my collection - isn’t that. It’s definitely not an issue when it’s opt-in like this is.