FreedomAdvocate @ FreedomAdvocate @lemmy.net.au

Oh hi there *person who I've upset by expressing my opinion who is now want

---

Read more

Posts

1

Comments

1,244

Joined

3 mo. ago

It's not just the stylus. Better screen (I think, though could be wrong, haven't read/watched much about the redmagic but had a quick look at spec comparisons), better software (including Dex), etc.

And NASA hasn't put anyone on the moon in how long? Did NASA make a re-usable booster? Were they even trying to? Were nasa planning to send people to Mars?

NASA has gone down the drain over the last say 30 years, would you agree?

Write your own OS and software then. Your hardware is running someone else’s software otherwise, so no you don’t get to control every aspect of what it does.

So you don’t even know and didn’t bother to check if it is on-device before attacking it for not being on-device?

Recall is done on-client.

So you’ve never wanted to find an article/headline that you vaguely remember seeing? Or a product that you looked at? Or a picture that you looked at?

There absolutely is a use case for full reachability of everything you’ve done on your computer. Git commits and terminal history and “recent” files list don’t even come close to providing the same thing lol

Sure, but the Redmagic doesn’t have things the Samsung does - one of which seems to be a dealbreaker for you, the built in stylus.

You have any links to support that it’s just cheap materials causing the failures?

They didn’t circumvent the issue - they did what Microsoft tell developers to do in regards to their programs and recall lol.

This is just a thinly veiled ad for AdGuard.

If you would get that why wouldn’t you just get a Galaxy S2X Ultra?

Your comment says yes.

It’s almost like it was by design.

They also just spy on their own citizens anyway, because who is going to stop them?

Ideological reasons? You think nasa hasn’t made reusable self landing rockets and boosters because of ideological reasons?

Sending something one way into space isn’t hard. Having it come back is. Having it, and all the parts that it took to get it there and back, be safely returned to earth and able to be reused is stupidly hard.

What points are you talking about exactly?

That's not putting eggs in a basket, that's just wasteful government as always. The same government that you guys want to take control of SpaceX lol.

"Turning into" lol. The USA and all their partner countries like the ones in the 5 Eyes program have all been mass techno-surveillance states for decades.

You say "failed", engineers say "ok what have we learned and what can we improve/fix from this?". These launches are tests. Every single launch is testing every single part of the hardware and software. Tests failing isn't a bad thing, as it helps you fix problems and make things better.

Did you stop reading after the first part of my sentence?