Fredthefishlord @ Fredthefishlord @lemmy.blahaj.zone

Posts

1

Comments

739

Joined

2 yr. ago

This says very little about our society

Yup. Aoc is perfect for a party leader.

Fossil fuels have spent massive sums of money lobbying against nuclear for decades.

5 years is a long time

-sincerely, a young man

Actual answer is that many brands will still uphold a level of quality. The decay and race downward is not immediate, even though the ramifications will be long felt, so you will be mostly safe for the next 4 years from food poisoning. Just don't try the lowest quality brands after a year if we stay on this course...

A lot of those types don't forget. They just think that now that the issue is gone(even when it isn't) the organizations are "government overreach" now.

And that it'll be idiots who die from not being safe etc not them

With china's rise usa power fell

Take households from census data, divide by number of buildings. If the number is greater than 2 you're wrong, less, you're right. But I don't know if that data is available

If you map it by population, I would expect there to be a difference.

Zoning is a good tool used poorly. Restaurants and grocery stores being subject to zoning creates issues. My personal belief is neither should be subject to zoning (but still have the parking lots be.) Auto shops, manufacturing, and mining operation type things are examples of where zoning is good.

Ngl I live in Chicago so to me it seems like the norm rather than the outliar

Alcoholic coded

I don't think your distinction between moderation and filters is correct.

I would say it's closer to filters are something to curate what you see, and moderation is to curate the community.

Trust based systems are absolutely an amazing idea, but it is a very good idea to make it so once you have a level of 'trust' you don't just apply filters, but actual moderation instead. Having a hybrid system, where you can apply filters from a certain set of users, but also allow purely trolling or immoral(ie cp and gore) to be fully removed so that new users or visitors to the community do not have issues.

It also serves as a stronger prevention measure against racists and nazis.

It also serves to preserve the correction function of communities, without allowing popular will to reject reasonable expectations just because they dislike them. That has happened a lot in redditor communities.

I strongly agree that purely centralized moderation is bad, but some level of centralization of moderation is beneficial.

You could also have trust go by community rather than platform based to prevent exploitation

Sounds like you're mistaking filters for moderation.

Yup. There should be high enough tariffs that it discourages shitty trinket buying... But focused on the crap, not just a blanket

Referring to 100k as "survivable" is crazy ngl. But yeah

Geopolitics wise, it's a false dichotomy. Countries do not need to pick between the 2. There's also Europe to align themselves to.

Yeah saw and it's still such a silly thing to say. Like is a genocide better because you keep it to yourself? Christ.

Why are you assuming they would be logical? They're a dictatorship

It does not make the slightest difference for location of where a country is overthrowing governments