Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)FR
Posts
1
Comments
725
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Also like, you know the court technicality removals are just that, on technicalities as opposed to just no justification...

    No, criticism of your party isn't advocacy for not voting either.

    Then what is your point, man. You want to advocate for 3p, which is the same as not voting until we get ranked choice?

  • All criticism of your shitty worthless republican-lite party does not mean advocacy for voting for the slightly worse party it keeps trying to be.

    ,,,yes? that's literally my issue. It's advocating to not vote, which is russian propaganda driven and only serves to reduce real ability to fight fascism in favor of grandstanding online as a keyboard warrior.

    Don't need to rig the vote if you sue to keep challengers off the ballot and then decide not to hold primaries at all.

    That is not a common practice. It happens, yes. But it's not common

  • So your response is that you'd rather watch the country burn in hell than vote democratic to stave it off?

    Anyone who suggests primaries as a means to end the entrenched conservative hegemony in democratic party leadership knows better and is gloating.

    Fair? When did I say fair? They're not fair. But, the votes in them are not rigged.

  • Or, you know, you could just primary existing candidates. That's always been an option. Take over the infrastructure from within is not as hard as you make it out to be with how it's set up.

    You cannot change the government without the will of the people on some level.

  • Any European country the workers have more rights and safer working places than in china. What is the point of a worker's council if the workers don't actually have the power to make life better for themselves?

  • Yes, and when there's no downside, that's fine. There's plenty of downsides to allowing kids to use smartphones. If the actual and serious concern was for their children, they could give their children dumb phones instead.

    Also no, it wouldn't've been effective for any nuclear weapons?

  • The same logic used to have nuclear drills where you get under the desks. It's ineffective, does nothing, and will change nothing. It only serves for helicopter parents to feel better about themselves. As their kids brains rot away